Jihadi Du Jour: Is Ahmedinajad’s Presidency Breeding Discontent?

Amer Taheri writing on Iran’s Economic Crisis, says:

Ahmadinejad isn’t bringing the oil money “to every dinner table.”

BY AMIR TAHERI
Wednesday, May 9, 2007 12:01 a.m. EDT

For the past five weeks, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s Islamic Moral Brigades have been clashing with groups of young Iranians on the streets of Tehran and other major cities over the government’s crackdown on “immodest dress.” The crackdown is seen by many Iranians as another step toward an even more suffocating social atmosphere in the crisis-stricken country. Both Mr. Ahmadinejad and his mentor, the “Supreme Leader” Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, claim that the way young Iranians dress is the most immediate threat to their Islamist dystopia.

Television footage of young men and women engaged in scuffles with Moral Brigades may lead some in the West to assume that the opposition to the Khomeinist regime is mostly urban and middle class, and solely concerned with greater social freedoms. That, however, is only part of the story. While social issues continue to poison life in the Islamic Republic, it is economic issues that spell the most trouble for Mr. Ahmadinejad’s struggling presidency.

Last week tens of thousands of angry workers, forming an illegal umbrella organization, flexed their muscles against President Ahmadinejad on International Labor Day in Tehran and a dozen provincial capitals. Marching through the capital’s streets, the workers carried a coffin draped in black with the legend “Workers’ Rights” inscribed on it. They shouted “No to slave labor! Yes, to freedom and dignity!”

Mr. Ahmadinejad centered his 2005 presidential campaign on a promise to “bring the country’s oil money to every family’s dinner table.” After the election his position was boosted by a dramatic rise in oil prices, providing him with more than $100 million a day in state revenues. And, yet, all official statistics show that, with inflation running around 18% and unemployment jumping to more than 30%, the average Iranian is worse off than three years ago. Under the previous administration of President Mohammad Khatami, the Islamic Republic scored average annual economic growth rates of around 4%. In a nation that needs to create a million new jobs to cope with its exploding demography, that kind of growth was certainly not enough to point to any Eldorado anytime soon. But it was enough to prevent the economy from sinking. Under President Ahmadinejad, however, the growth rate has dropped to around 3%–and that despite rising oil revenues.

That putrid little maggot, Ahmedinajad, has been too busy with his IslamFascist foreign adventures and his IslamoFascist ideas of economics to actually do something that could benefit his people. Read on please, gentle reader…

Because it controls the oil revenue, which comes in U.S. dollars, the Islamic state has a vested interest in a weak national currency. (It could get more rials for the same amount of dollars in the domestic market.) Mr. Ahmadinejad has tried to exploit that opportunity by printing an unprecedented quantity of rials. Economists in Tehran speak of “the torrent of worthless rials” that Mr. Ahmadinejad has used to finance his extravagant promises of poverty eradication. The result has been massive flights of capital, mostly into banks in Dubai, Malaysia and Austria. Ayatollah Mahmoud Shahroudi, the Islamic Chief Justice, claims that as much as $300 billion may have left the country since President Ahmadinejad was sworn in.

According to Abbas Abdi, a Tehran researcher and loyal critic of the regime, Iran is experiencing its worst economic crisis since the late 1970s. The effects of this are seen in the slowdown in real-estate prices–the first since 1997, even in Tehran’s prime districts. Printing money and spending on a no-tomorrow basis are not the only reasons for the crisis. President Ahmadinejad’s entire economic philosophy seems to be designed to do more harm than good.

The president’s favorite catchword is “khodkafa’I” or “self sufficiency.” To the horror of most Iranians, especially the millions connected with the bazaars, who regard trade as the noblest of pursuits, Mr. Ahmadinejad insists that the only way Iran can preserve its “Islamic purity” is to reduce dependence on foreign commerce.

“Whatever we can produce we should do ourselves,” the president likes to say. “Even if what we produce is not as good, and more costly.” His rationale goes something like this: The global economic system is a Jewish-Crusader conspiracy to keep Muslim nations in a position of weakness and dependency. Thus, Muslims would do better by relying on their own resources even if that means lower living standards.

One of President Ahmadinejad’s first moves was to freeze a six-year-old policy designed to help the Islamic Republic become a member of the World Trade Organization; in his book the WTO is just another “Jewish-Crusader” invention to cement the inferior position of Muslim economies. It was with reference to “khodkafa’i” that Mr. Ahmadinejad decided to harden the regime’s position on the nuclear issue, even if that meant United Nations sanctions and war with the U.S. The Iranian president claims that the seven countries currently capable of producing nuclear fuel plan to set up a global cartel and control the world market for enriched uranium, once mankind, having exhausted fossil fuels, is forced to depend on nuclear energy.

Convinced that Islam is destined for a “clash of civilizations” against the “Infidel”–led by the U.S., of course–President Ahmadinejad is determined to preserve what he regards as the Islamic Republic’s “independence.” One of his favorite themes is the claim that, forced to choose between freedom and independence, good Muslims would prefer the latter.

Khodkafa’i has had catastrophic results on many sectors of the Iranian industry. Unable to reduce, let alone stop, imports of mass consumer goods (including almost half of the nation’s food) controlled by powerful mullahs and Revolutionary Guard commanders, President Ahmadinejad has tightened import rules for a range of raw materials and spare parts needed by factories across the nation. The policy has already all but killed the once-buoyant textile industry, destroying tens of thousands of jobs. It has also affected hundreds of small and medium-size businesses that, in some cases, have been unable to pay their employees for months.

Mr. Ahmadinejad has also used khodkafa’i as an excuse to freeze a number of business deals aimed at preventing the collapse of Iran’s aging and semi-derelict oil and gas fields. He has also vetoed foreign participation in building oil refineries, forcing the Islamic Republic to import more than 40% of the refined petroleum products consumed in Iran. The prospect of a prolonged duel with the U.N., and possible military clash with the U.S., has also hurt the Iranian economy in the past six months.

One result of the president’s weird policy is the series of strikes that have continued in Tehran and at least 20 other major cities since last autumn. Last year, one major strike by transport workers in Tehran brought the city of 15 million to a standstill for several days. Right now tens of thousands of workers in industries as diverse as gas refining, paper and newsprint, automobile, and copper mining are on strike.

Ayatollah Mahmoud Shahroudi, the Islamic Chief Justice, claims that as much as $300 billion may have left the country since President Ahmadinejad was sworn in. Whether this happens because this descendant of apes and pigs is a total idiot when it comes to economics, because in his religious zeal he has allowed himself to be blinded by reality the fact remains that President Ahmadinejad’s entire economic philosophy seems to be designed to do more harm than good.

As you read on you will see how similar his economic policies, however different the reasons for them, are to those of another darling of the left in the Western hemisphere. One of his favorite themes is the claim that, forced to choose between freedom and independence, good Muslims would prefer the latter. Even if his idea of “independence” destroys the whole country… except for the ruling Ayatollahs and their rich friends. Mr. Ahmadinejad has also used khodkafa’i as an excuse to freeze a number of business deals aimed at preventing the collapse of Iran’s aging and semi-derelict oil and gas fields. He has also vetoed foreign participation in building oil refineries, forcing the Islamic Republic to import more than 40% of the refined petroleum products consumed in Iran. The prospect of a prolonged duel with the U.N., and possible military clash with the U.S., has also hurt the Iranian economy in the past six months. 40% of refined petroleum products consumed in Iran have to be imported. The putrid little maggot must have a very strange definition of what “independence” means… For an oil rich country like Iran, importing 40% of it’s refined oil needs, does not sound very independent to my feeble understanding. What do you think, gentle reader?

President Ahmadinejad, however, is determined to impose what looks like a North Korean model on the Iranian economy. He has already dissolved the Syndicate of Iranian Employers (SKI) as a capitalist cabal, and plans to replace it with a government-appointed body. He is also pushing a new Labor Code through the Islamic Majlis (parliament) to replace the existing one written with the help of the International Labor Organization in the 1960s and amended in 1991.

The proposed text abolishes most of the rights won by workers throughout the world as a result of decades of social struggle and political reform. President Ahmadinejad believes that Western-style trade unions and employers’ associations have no place in a proper Islamic society where the state, representing the will of Allah, can keep the “community of the faithful” free of class struggle, a typical affliction of “Infidel” societies.

Mr. Ahmadinejad’s next coup will likely be a major privatization scheme affecting more than 40 public corporations across the country. He has promised to help the employees buy up to 10% of the shares. The rest will go to rich mullahs and Revolutionary Guard officers and their business associates, using low interest loans from state-owned banks. By the time the scheme is ready, however, the Islamic Republic may be facing too deep an economic crisis for anyone–even greedy mullahs and corrupt Revolutionary Guardsmen–to want to invest even a borrowed rial there.

The Bolivarian Socialist, the leader of Venezuela - Hugo Chávez is pursuing very similar policies if you care to examine them outside of political ideology. Ahmedinajad and Chávez are very good friends (even if the only reason is their hatred for the US. Ahmedinajad has already wrecked the economy of Iran, while benefiting only greedy mullahs and corrupt Revolutionary Guardsmen, he is taking Kim Jong Il from North Korea as his model. Kim “the Mad” Jong Il has totally ruined his country, there is hunger and object poverty while the ruling classes are enjoying such high living standards that rival anything in the Western world. The Communist workers paradise of North Korea is no paradise, ask the average North Korean and prepare for a horrible tale of woe, yet the putrid little maggot is accelerating Iran’s journey into the very same situation.

Hugo Chávez, that malodorous piece of devil’s dung ruling Venezuela, is slowly gearing up to follow the same libretto as his bosom buddy, Ahmedinajad. Both worship Kim Jong Il, both are trying hard to export their ideas and take over the regions around them. How? Ahmedinajad, through his puppets - Assad from Syria and Nasrallah from Hizbullah and Hugo Chávez by influencing elections throughout Latin America. And yet both dictators, both tramplers of human rights, are being sought after by Nanci Pelosi. In her zeal to embrace America’s sworn enemies in order to bring about the downfall of President Bush, the defeat of our troops in Iraq (which will only benefit Ahmedinajad, Baby Assad and Al-Quaieda) in order to bring back the Democrat party to power. There is such a thing as a loyal opposition… and then there are traitors. Pelosi, Reid, Murtha, Durbin et al, are not the loyal opposition kind. They are the treacherous cancer within!

Just like Ahmedinajad’s economic policies aren’t bringing the oil money “to every dinner table.” Just as his polocies spell disaster for Iran, so too the policies of Pelosi and company spell total disaster for America. Will the Iranians become enraged enough to get rid of the vicious destroyer of the country? Will Americans wake up and put a stop to the lack of logic, to the blatant “party above all” policies of Pelosi and company as dictated by the likes of George Soros and Michael Moore?

Chaim

Crossposted at: Freedom's Cost