Wednesday, February 25, 2009

Indoctrination and Training Camps - Islamicizing the West

The new US President, Barack Obama, hit the ground running. He wasted no timein making his first phone to a foreign dignitary, it was to Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas; his first major interview as the American President was on an Arab TV network; in spite of the UN preparing itself to try the murderers of Lebanon's Rafik Hariri, Obama dispatched Senator Kerry to woo Syria's Baby Assad and try to tear him away from under Iran's wings (fat chance!). In a few days, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton will be in Cairo where she will announce a $900,000,000 grant to help Gazans rebuild (under the aegis of Hamas, perhaps with the help of Mahmoud Abbas... if Hamas comes to some convenient temporary agreement with him!). At the same time, we in the US under Obama's direction are ready to import thousands of Gazans to our shores and give them a chance for a better life (even if that means turning to terror and/or preaching hatred of all things American.

Yet, the British daily Telegraph reports:

CIA warns Barack Obama that British terrorists are the biggest threat to the US



American spy chiefs have told the President that the CIA has launched a vast spying operation in the UK to prevent a repeat of the 9/11 attacks being launched from Britain.

They believe that a British-born Pakistani extremist entering the US under the visa waiver programme is the most likely source of another terrorist spectacular on American soil.

Intelligence briefings for Mr Obama have detailed a dramatic escalation in American espionage in Britain, where the CIA has recruited record numbers of informants in the Pakistani community to monitor the 2,000 terrorist suspects identified by MI5, the British security service.

A British intelligence source revealed that a staggering four out of 10 CIA operations designed to thwart direct attacks on the US are now conducted against targets in Britain.

And a former CIA officer who has advised Mr Obama told The Sunday Telegraph that the CIA has stepped up its efforts in the last month after the Mumbai massacre laid bare the threat from Lashkar-e-Taiba, the militant group behind the attacks, which has an extensive web of supporters in the UK.

The CIA has already spent 18 months developing a network of agents in Britain to combat al-Qaeda, unprecedented in size within the borders of such a close ally, according to intelligence sources in both London and Washington.

Bruce Riedel, a former CIA officer who has advised Mr Obama, told The Sunday Telegraph: "The British Pakistani community is recognised as probably al-Qaeda's best mechanism for launching an attack against North America.

"The American security establishment believes that danger continues and there's very intimate cooperation between our security services to monitor that." Mr Riedel, who served three presidents as a Middle East expert on the White House National Security Council, added: "President Obama's national security team are well aware that this is a serious threat."

The British official said: "The Americans run their own assets in the Pakistani community; they get their own intelligence. There's close cooperation with MI5 but they don't tell us the names of all their sources.

"Around 40 per cent of CIA activity on homeland threats is now in the UK. This is quite unprecedented."

Explaining the increase in CIA activity over the past month, Mr Riedel added: "In the aftermath of the Mumbai attack the US and the UK intelligence services now have to regard Lashkar-e-Taiba as just as serious a threat to both of our countries as al-Qaeda. They have a much more extensive base among Pakistani Diaspora communities in the UK than al–Qaeda."

Information gleaned by CIA spies in Britain has already helped thwart several terrorist attacks in the UK and was instrumental in locating Rashid Rauf, a British-born al-Qaeda operative implicated in a plot to explode airliners over the Atlantic, who was tracked down and killed in a US missile strike in November.

But some US intelligence officers are irritated that valuable manpower and resources have been diverted to the UK. One former intelligence officer who does contract work for the CIA dismissed Britain as a "swamp" of jihadis.

Jonathan Evans, the director general of MI5, admitted in January that the Security Service alone does not have the resources to maintain surveillance on all its targets. "We don't have anything approaching comprehensive coverage," he said.

The dramatic escalation in CIA activity in the UK followed the exposure in August 2006 of Operation Overt, the alleged airline bomb plot.

The British intelligence official revealed that CIA chiefs sent more resources to the UK because they were not prepared to see American citizens die as a result of MI5's inability to keep tabs on all suspects, even though the Security Service successfully uncovered the plot.

Meanwhile, what does Britain do about this cancer within? How does it deal with the threat? Last Friday's Friday's Daily Mail reported:
Pupils as young as 11 are being encouraged to imagine the July 7 bombings from the perspective of the terrorists as part of citizenship lessons promoted by the Government.

Secondary schools are urged to set the exercise by a lesson pack showcased on an official website for teachers.

However after being alerted to the material last night, ministers admitted it was ‘misguided and inappropriate’ and said it would be withdrawn immediately from the Government’s Teachernet website.

Schools in areas including Calderdale in West Yorkshire, Birmingham, Sandwell and Lancashire are said to be using the material.

Several police forces are also said to have adopted it as part of programmes to promote community cohesion.

A section in the lesson pack deals directly with the July 7 bombings of 2005 in which 52 London commuters were killed and 700 people injured.

A suggested group exercise requires pupils to ‘prepare a brief presentation on the 7/7 bombings from the perspective of the bombers’. They are also asked to summarise the ‘reasons ... for the actions of the London bombers’.

The suggestion that children should be asked to empathise with the bombers caused concern among heads last night.

Chris McGovern, a headmaster and director of History Curriculum Association, said: ‘In my view, this is extremely dangerous. Asking pupils to empathise with terrorists may lead to sympathy, and sympathy begins to lead to justification.

‘You begin to glamorise it – it’s disastrous.

‘This shows how out of touch the education establishment is with the rest of society.’

The teaching pack, for pupils aged 11 to 19, was developed by the council in Calderdale. Three of the 7/7 bombers came from the West Yorkshire area.

It is used in West Yorkshire madrassas and mosques, the Times Educational Supplement reported.

It had also been adopted by the Department for Children, Schools and Families as part of an online ‘toolkit’ to help teachers tackle extremism.

Last night a spokesman for the DCSF said ministers had decided to withdraw the material from the Teachernet site ‘as they believe it to be misguided and inappropriate’.

He said: ‘It’s important young people discuss these difficult and controversial issues in a controlled environment but, in this case, ministers apologise for any offence caused.’

Don Rowe, of the Citizenship Foundation, said he doubted if many teachers would wish to broach the ‘complicated’ issue.

‘I certainly wouldn’t expect anyone who wasn’t confident in this area to barge in with this sort of material,’ he said.

Explaining the materials, Sail Suleman, Calderdale’s hate crime co-ordinator and author of the pack, said: ‘Why do young people go out and do what the bombers did? Was it pressure from individuals they were hanging out with?

‘Hopefully, we’ll encourage pupils to stay away from those individuals.’

‘Hopefully, we’ll encourage pupils to stay away from those individuals.’ Riiiight! Mr Suleman sounds very convincing, don't you think so, gentle reader?!?!? Perhaps his attitude will explain this:
Some Islamic schools are promoting fundamentalist views and encouraging children to despise Western society, a report warns.

An investigation by the Civitas social policy think-tank found websites of some of the UK’s 166 Muslim schools are spreading extreme teachings, while a handful had links to sites promoting jihad, or holy war.

Examples include web forums forbidding Muslims from reading Harry Potter books, playing chess or cricket and listening to Western music.

The Civitas report, entitled Music, Chess and Other Sins, claims Ofsted inspectors are incapable of scrutinising Muslim faith schools properly, and demands an inquiry by MPs.

Many of the websites featured in the report were shut down or edited in the hours before it was published.

Islamic schools educate thousands of Muslim children. Most operate in the private sector although increasing numbers are seeking state funding.

Some Islamic schools are promoting fundamentalist views and encouraging children to despise Western society... Most operate in the private sector although increasing numbers are seeking state funding. I am not in any way, shape, or form, opposed to private religious schooling. I raised five kids who attended private Jewish religious schools and grew up to be successful professionals with families of their own. While I would not have minded some property tax relief , it never occurred to me or any parents I knew, or to any member of the schools' administrations to seek government funding. It would have been unfair, to say the least, and against separation of Church and state. None of the schools ever taught my kids and now their kids to despise Western society either. They are well integrated, and while proudly Jewish, they are are first and foremost Americans! By the way, you can believe when I tell that more than once my wife and I had to forego or at least compromise on some vacation and many other plans or paying for the schools would have been very hard, if not impossible. So why did we do it? We felt it was important for our children! Do these Muslim parents not feel it is important enough to sacrifice for their children? Or are their children to be raised as sacrifices to Allah, at taxpayers expense?!?!?!?

In a clear signal of their true spirit of dhimmitude, the European Court of Human Rights has awarded £2,500 to al-Qaeda’s European envoy:
HATE preacher Abu Qatada was today awarded £2,500 compensation after judges ruled his detention without trial in the UK breached his human rights.

Yesterday Qatada— dubbed al-Qaeda’s European envoy — lost the latest round of his UK legal battle to stay in Britain.

But 24 hours later he won a separate case in the European Court of Human Rights that his detention violated the Human Rights Convention.

Attacks
He was held under anti-terror laws introduced by the Government after the 2001 attacks on America.

Shadow home secretary Chris Grayling said today of the ruling: “This decision will horrify most reasonable people in the UK. TheSun
“It shows just how incompetent the Government has been at managing the problem of preachers of hate and, frankly, it makes a mockery of the concept of human rights if we can’t protect ourselves against people who are out to destroy our society.”

Do you remember, gentle reader, when a couple of weeks ago the UK's Jacqui Smith refused to allow Geert Wilders into Britain to speak before the House of Lords? It seems that in the interest of multiculturism she's been contemplating allowing a known anti western Muslim extremist into the UK:
Jacqui Smith was tonight warned against exercising 'double standards' as an Islamic extremist prepared to travel to the UK.

Ibrahim Moussawi, a known hardliner with links to Hezbollah, has been invited to speak at a London university.

But the Home Secretary is under pressure to refuse an entry visa to Moussawi, who has allegedly described Jews as 'a lesion on the forehead of history'.

Earlier this month, she banned the far-Right Dutch MP Geert Wilders from coming to Britain to show his film about Islam as it would threaten 'community harmony'.

But the Conservatives warned that to ban those who threaten community harmony, while letting in those who glorify terrorism or are part of terrorist groups, would send out the 'wrong message'.

There must be 'no double standards on extremists', warned Tory security spokesman Baroness Neville-Jones.

Moussawi, who has already made at least two trips to the UK, has been invited to speak on political Islam at the School of Oriental and African Studies next month.

Editor for the newspaper of Lebanon-based terrorist organisation Hezbollah, he is a former political editor of the Iranian-backed group's TV station, which is banned in many countries including France, Spain and the U.S, as its output is seen as anti-Semitic.

Despite his background he has twice been allowed to speak publicly in Britain by the Home Office, once in December 2007 and again in February 2008.

Yesterday, in a letter to Miss Smith, Baroness Neville-Jones said: 'You will be aware that Mr Moussawi has links to Hezbollah, which is a proscribed terrorist organisation in many countries.

'Mr Moussawi has also, over the years, made a number of remarks that are extremist, anti-Semitic and inflammatory. In October last year you introduced what you described as "tough new measures" to deny entry to extremists.

'These measures included "creating a presumption in favour of exclusion in respect of all those who have engaged in fostering, encouraging or spreading extremism and hatred". Mr Moussawi has so engaged.

'In line with your "tough new measures", I trust that if Mr Moussawi applies for entry, you will use your powers to exclude him.'

Home Office sources said Moussawi's visa application had not yet been received, but would be studied closely.

A spokesman said: 'The Government opposes extremism in all its forms. We are determined to prevent individuals coming to the UK who want to spread extremism or hatred in our communities.

'Exclusion decisions are based on hard evidence not hearsay, and are targeted at those who seek to stir up tension and provoke others to violence regardless of their origins and beliefs.'

The problem of children's indoctrination, however, is not merely a British problem, such practices to some degree or another are slowly being introduced throughout Europe and in the US, (aside from that .pdf document in the last link, you can also see a different report here) in the interest of multiculturalism Islamic indoctrination. Over at Islam in Europe, you can watch a BBC show on Islamic extremists in Britain, other videos give a far, far, worse picture of the stark new reality...

Lest you think that whatever may be happening over in the UK and elsewhere in Europe is merely a European problem perhaps much smaller over here on our shores, let me disabuse you of such mistaken notions. It's happening right here, among us, in some city near you!



The question, therefore, remains... shall we sit quietly by and acquiesce? Shall we occasionally throw a piece or two to this crocodile hoping we'll be the last to be swallowed up?!?!?

Chaim

Digg it!

Crossposted at: Freedom's Cost

Socialize this! Personalize this! Radicalize this!

Sunday, February 22, 2009

Multiculturalism, Anticulturalism

Celebrating and coexisting with other cultures besides one’s own is very laudable… on paper! For multiculturalism to succeed, all sides must be interested and open to each other, the moment one side uses multiculturalism to weaken the other, multiculturalism is not only bound to fail, but will result in the destruction of the Western way of life. From Sultan Knish:

Cry Islamophobia and Let Loose the Dogs of War

The Muslim oversensitivity to any perceived insult is in directly inverse proportion to how much hate Muslims themselves are willing to display for others.

If you go by Muslim standards, removing a man wearing a t-shirt with Arabic words off a plane is an unacceptable display of Islamophobia, but banning an Israeli tennis player from Dubai is completely legitimate.

Drawing cartoons of Mohammed as a terrorist is not acceptable, but calling for the deaths of the cartoonists is. Writing a book parodying Islam is unacceptable, but murdering the book’s translators around the world is reasonable.

Israeli checkpoints on the Gaza border are unacceptable examples of apartheid, but Saudi Arabia barring all non-Muslims from entering the city of Mecca or from holding Saudi citizenship– is their right.

Obviously “apartheid’ is an epithet to be thrown only at the Jewish Zionist Entity, if for no other reason than to subliminally make you think of the word NAZI. great way to dem Jooz‘ goat, ain’t it?

A protest against Hamas and Al Queda that desecrates their flags, which have verses from the Koran on them, is unacceptable offensive to Muslims– but Muslim student associations waving those same flags is something that no one may question.

A Muslim “refugee” who is arrested for illegally entering a European country is being imprisoned solely out of “Islamophobia”, as are the terrorists held in Guantanamo Bay– but Westerners who enter a Muslim country lose all rights and may be imprisoned, tortured and flogged on the flimsiest of allegations from a Muslim.

Western countries expecting that a Muslim woman remove her Hijab for an ID photo is Islamophobia. However Muslim countries have the right to demand that even the House Speaker and First Lady cover up their hair when visiting a Muslim country.

Isn’t that a fair price to pay for the success of multiculturalism in the West?

When a Muslim man has woman’s underwear put on his head, while detaining for trying to kill American soldiers, that is the vilest crime against humanity. However when Muslim men hang and flog women for adultery… that is their culture and we have no right to judge. Not unless we’re Islamophobes, that is.

Muslim paranoid fears of Western culture can legitimately express themselves in banning magazines, Valentine’s day celebrations and movies. However any Western resistance to the Koran or Arabic is a clear sign of Islamophobia.

A Koran in a toilet is a hate crime. However burning the contents of the Library of Alexandria because “if it’s not in the Koran, it’s superfluous”, is a legitimate expression of Muslim views on non-Muslim literature.

Prejudice against Muslims is unacceptable. But Muslim prejudices against women, Jews, Christians, gays, Buddhists, Zoroastrians, Atheists, and just about everyone else– are part of their culture. And who are we to judge if they feel they have a right to hate and kill anyone who isn’t a Muslim male.

They cry “Islamophobia” and they even get a compliant, submissive, UN to declare it a crime. All the while their own Infidel-o-phobia and their own despicable misoginy is far worse than any real or perceived islamophobia… but neither the United Nations, nor any human rights organizations, nor even any feminist groups have been heard making any sound to protest the all too obvious prejudices lurking in the hearts of IslamoFascists!

The problem with all of these examples is that Muslims want to have it both ways. On the one hand they want a blank check that allows them to treat any negative feedback as Islamophobia. On the other hand they want to be able to express any degree and form of hatred for others and support for terrorism in public forums without any repercussions.

What Muslims really want is Political Correctness for us, and none for them. They want a chain around our necks with the leash in their hand, while the other hand waves a Hizbollah flag. And that can’t work.

If Danish cartoonist can’t draw Mohammed, then Muslim protesters should at the very least be unable to call for the murder of their political opponents. If Christian pastors are to be censored for denouncing Islam, then the Finsbury Park Mosque rabble should be too.

What the multiculturals fail to perceive is that there is no give and take. Islam (in its current form) has no interest in sharing the planet with the infidels. To that end, it will use the infidels’ own laws and institutions to destroy it and turn the world into an Islamic empire. The Muslim Brotherhood makes no secret of such a plan, so many of its offshoots around the world make no secret of such a plan and yet the multicultural crowd foolishly believes that by bending over backwards they are bound to inspire love. They will, but it certainly won’t the kind of love, they crave for…

The Canadian Arab Federation decided to host pro-Hamas articles on its site, to push for airing Al Jazeera in Canada, to participate in openly terrorist rallies and then respond to criticism by insulting the Immigration Minister. But naturally the consequences of all that only came due because of Islamophobia.

Muslims have gotten too comfortable sweeping a lot under the rug by crying Islamophobia. But that implies that they actually wish to be part of a tolerant multicultural society, where everyone’s rights are respected. By their actions and agendas however, that is not the society they wish to be a part of. Neither in Ridyah, Tehran, Gaza, Karachi or London, Paris and Detroit.

It is up to Muslims themselves to decide what role they wish to play abroad and in the global culture. They can be intolerant fanatics who stay at home and expect everyone else to stay at home too. Or they can be open and tolerant enough to live side by side with others. But they can’t be intolerant fanatics who expect us to be tolerant and open toward their fanatical intolerance. Not on our dime.

That is the problem, and it is a Gordian Knot that Muslims can either try to untie themselves, or someone will wind up cutting through it for them.


Swedish victim,
Muslim gang rape
(photo from:
IRIS BLOG
)

Multiculturalism has wittingly or unwittingly turned out to be the most sexist, most prejudiced form of fascism… Whoa hold it there, you say gently reader. I know you are thinking that was one idiotic, ignorant prejudiced statement, right?!?!? Was it? How many honor killings have those professing Islam committed throughout the West, just in in the last five years? How much intolerance and total disreespect towards the West have they shown, both in the West and in their own lands? In Sweden the number of rapes has grown in geometrical proportions ever since the number of Muslim immigrants has increased, and not coincidentally the overwhelming percentage of rapists profess Islam as their religion!

For those who naively believe that Islamists living in the West will come to embrace our culture as much as you embrace theirs, for those of you who naively believe that everything above is merely fear mongering, for those of you who believe that while there may be a few bad apples masquerading as Muslims, just like there are despicable mysogynists right here in the West, Muslims regard women as equal let me cross-post something from my friend Punx, over at The Liberal Heretic:

Play: Choose the Correct Curse, I Mean Verse, In the Quran

Play Choose the Verse (and sura): First, you must imagine you’re a faithful Muslim, and as the man in the family, you’re responsible for the moral behavior of the women you’re related to. In keeping with this age old tradition, you must choose the correct sura in the Quran to appropriately punish your charges should they shame your proud name and honor.

1.) Have a spare wife you want to get rid of, and you hate her enough to want to punish her for the rest of her life? Don’t bother with divorce, accuse her of lewdness. Imprison her in solitary confinement, never to hear another human voice or ever have contact with another person until she goes insane and dies! All you need are 4 good buddies to concur that she is indeed guilty of lewdness…or you just have to swear it’s true. Choose the sura:

a.) Sura XXIV, 60

b.) Sura IV, 11

c.) Sura IV, 15

If you chose a or b, you shall never enter Paradise, you vile infidel! Every good Muslim knows the answer is c.

*Sura IV, 15: If any of your women are guilty of lewdness, Take the evidence of four witnesses among you, Against them; and if they testify, CONFINE THEM TO HOUSES UNTIL DEATH DO CLAIM THEM.

2.) Follow up to number 1. You have accused your wife of lewdness, but you have no witnesses willing to support your accusations. Not a problem, choose the sura that will get you out of this sticky situation

a.) Sura XXIV, 6

b.) Sura III, 3

c.) Sura II, 220

If you chose b or c, you’re the son of a mangy camel! Every good Muslim man knows the Quran guarantees that if no “witnesses” can be found, just the word of the man is good enough in its book.

*Sura XXIV, 6: And for those who launch accusations against their spouses and have no evidence but their own, Their solitary evidence can be received if they bear witness four times With an oath by Allah, That they are solemnly telling the Truth.

3.) After disposing of that pesky wife (above), you still have 3 more. One is young and beautiful, so you don’t really want to get rid of her, but she CAN be a pain. Didn’t she just yesterday suggest that you take Mohammed Blvd. instead of Allah Way as a shortcut to the bazaar? How dare she? Choose the correct verse to support your discipline regimen.

a.) Sura II, 241

b.) Sura III,3

c.) Sura IV, 34

I know all you faithful Muslim men got this one right. Obviously it’s c.

*Sura IV, 34: As to those women on whose part ye do fear disloyalty and ill-conduct, Admonish them, Refuse to share their beds, and beat them; but if they return to obedience, seek not against them Means of annoyance…

Thank you for playing Choose the Curse.

Will my female readers acquiesce and submit to any Muslim masters? No, ladies, my question did not refer to the submissives ones among you; my question was meant for every Western woman who prides herself of being a woman and not just a male plaything.

Will my male readers quietly, passively, sit back and just let IslamoFascism take over and trample on our values, and our lifestyle? On August 17, 1945, George Orwell published Animal Farm. It remains a classic that exposes totalitarianism and how it unobtrusively takes over a society. In Orwell’s allegory the pigs refer to the Soviet Union. In this the early 21st Century the pigs came to represent precisely those who most hate the symbol! The pigs are the IslamoFascists who rail against the West, while enjoying the welfare of Western societies, while living at taxpayers’ expense and using Western freedoms and rights to destroy westerners’ freedoms and rights.

Towards the end of Orwell’s Animal Farm the animal are shocked to see that certain rules have changed, a new one says: All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others. Every ethnic group, every religious group that ever came to the West, while keeping its major customs and traditional values, managed to successfully integrate into the host society. That is… all except one which refuses to integrate, all except one who aims to take take over and convert or destroy every infidel as they slowly and efficiently subvert western rule of law… The time has come when we must make these pigs understand unequivocally, that in spite of their illusions of grandeur, they are NOT more equal but… they are merely behaving like PIGS!!!!

Chaim

Digg it!

Cross-posted at: Freedom's Cost

Labels: , , , ,

Socialize this! Personalize this! Radicalize this!

Saturday, February 14, 2009

The Speech Never Given in the UK by Geert Wilders

begging for life from Muslims
Photo Credit: AGlobalCitizen

Europe is currently suffering through a plague - the disease? Bendurnea (prounounced bend-your-knee-a). Bendurnea is a medical condition that slowly eats away at one's spine in the face of Muslim threats which in turn causes the body to lean precipitously forward until the knees can no longer support the weight of the collective guilt of being intolerant toward a religion causing them to buckle under the pressure. The end-stage of Bendurnea disease is the complete failure of the knees to hold the body up and one is forced to spend the rest of one's life in a position of supplication and humiliating submission.



The manifestation of this dread illness was displayed symptomatically a few days ago in the UK when Dutch parliamentarian Geert Wilders, who was invited to deliver a speech and show his film Fitna at the House of Lords on 12 Feb 2009 was instead detained by UK immigration officials at London Heathrow airport and sent back to the Netherlands because he was deemed a risk to "public security."

It should be noted that begging is illegal in Britain since the passing of the Vagrancy Act of 1824 and so this has presented some difficulty to British bobbies who are unable to distinguish current sufferers of Bendurnea from ordinary panhandlers, especially those who lie on the ground groveling for pence.


Read the rest here.
.
.
.

Socialize this! Personalize this! Radicalize this!

Contributors

Jihadi Du Jour is actively looking for contributors who are concerned about America's future and are willing to research and post about the fight against Islamic Jihad. If you are interested email us at jihadidujour@yahoo.com

RASTAMAN
MEDIAN SIB
CAREN E
OBADIAH
U. INFIDEL
LAYLA
TODD
BERNIE
DEBBIE

HEIDI

JAY
JAMES
KATHY
JOHN
JOE S.

BETH
ROBERT

DARRELL
CHAIM

Guests: Stan Smith | Leonard Magruder | Random Thoughts @ TROP | Brigitte Gabriel | Annaqed The Critic | Miss Kelly | CENTCOM

Courtesy of Gabrielle--download and use freely

Blogroll Buzz! | Sponsored Buzz!

Featured video


And Blip.TV

Most wanted





Member:
NowPublic