Jihadi Du Jour

Sunday, February 22, 2009

Multiculturalism, Anticulturalism

Celebrating and coexisting with other cultures besides one’s own is very laudable… on paper! For multiculturalism to succeed, all sides must be interested and open to each other, the moment one side uses multiculturalism to weaken the other, multiculturalism is not only bound to fail, but will result in the destruction of the Western way of life. From Sultan Knish:

Cry Islamophobia and Let Loose the Dogs of War

The Muslim oversensitivity to any perceived insult is in directly inverse proportion to how much hate Muslims themselves are willing to display for others.

If you go by Muslim standards, removing a man wearing a t-shirt with Arabic words off a plane is an unacceptable display of Islamophobia, but banning an Israeli tennis player from Dubai is completely legitimate.

Drawing cartoons of Mohammed as a terrorist is not acceptable, but calling for the deaths of the cartoonists is. Writing a book parodying Islam is unacceptable, but murdering the book’s translators around the world is reasonable.

Israeli checkpoints on the Gaza border are unacceptable examples of apartheid, but Saudi Arabia barring all non-Muslims from entering the city of Mecca or from holding Saudi citizenship– is their right.

Obviously “apartheid’ is an epithet to be thrown only at the Jewish Zionist Entity, if for no other reason than to subliminally make you think of the word NAZI. great way to dem Jooz‘ goat, ain’t it?

A protest against Hamas and Al Queda that desecrates their flags, which have verses from the Koran on them, is unacceptable offensive to Muslims– but Muslim student associations waving those same flags is something that no one may question.

A Muslim “refugee” who is arrested for illegally entering a European country is being imprisoned solely out of “Islamophobia”, as are the terrorists held in Guantanamo Bay– but Westerners who enter a Muslim country lose all rights and may be imprisoned, tortured and flogged on the flimsiest of allegations from a Muslim.

Western countries expecting that a Muslim woman remove her Hijab for an ID photo is Islamophobia. However Muslim countries have the right to demand that even the House Speaker and First Lady cover up their hair when visiting a Muslim country.

Isn’t that a fair price to pay for the success of multiculturalism in the West?

When a Muslim man has woman’s underwear put on his head, while detaining for trying to kill American soldiers, that is the vilest crime against humanity. However when Muslim men hang and flog women for adultery… that is their culture and we have no right to judge. Not unless we’re Islamophobes, that is.

Muslim paranoid fears of Western culture can legitimately express themselves in banning magazines, Valentine’s day celebrations and movies. However any Western resistance to the Koran or Arabic is a clear sign of Islamophobia.

A Koran in a toilet is a hate crime. However burning the contents of the Library of Alexandria because “if it’s not in the Koran, it’s superfluous”, is a legitimate expression of Muslim views on non-Muslim literature.

Prejudice against Muslims is unacceptable. But Muslim prejudices against women, Jews, Christians, gays, Buddhists, Zoroastrians, Atheists, and just about everyone else– are part of their culture. And who are we to judge if they feel they have a right to hate and kill anyone who isn’t a Muslim male.

They cry “Islamophobia” and they even get a compliant, submissive, UN to declare it a crime. All the while their own Infidel-o-phobia and their own despicable misoginy is far worse than any real or perceived islamophobia… but neither the United Nations, nor any human rights organizations, nor even any feminist groups have been heard making any sound to protest the all too obvious prejudices lurking in the hearts of IslamoFascists!

The problem with all of these examples is that Muslims want to have it both ways. On the one hand they want a blank check that allows them to treat any negative feedback as Islamophobia. On the other hand they want to be able to express any degree and form of hatred for others and support for terrorism in public forums without any repercussions.

What Muslims really want is Political Correctness for us, and none for them. They want a chain around our necks with the leash in their hand, while the other hand waves a Hizbollah flag. And that can’t work.

If Danish cartoonist can’t draw Mohammed, then Muslim protesters should at the very least be unable to call for the murder of their political opponents. If Christian pastors are to be censored for denouncing Islam, then the Finsbury Park Mosque rabble should be too.

What the multiculturals fail to perceive is that there is no give and take. Islam (in its current form) has no interest in sharing the planet with the infidels. To that end, it will use the infidels’ own laws and institutions to destroy it and turn the world into an Islamic empire. The Muslim Brotherhood makes no secret of such a plan, so many of its offshoots around the world make no secret of such a plan and yet the multicultural crowd foolishly believes that by bending over backwards they are bound to inspire love. They will, but it certainly won’t the kind of love, they crave for…

The Canadian Arab Federation decided to host pro-Hamas articles on its site, to push for airing Al Jazeera in Canada, to participate in openly terrorist rallies and then respond to criticism by insulting the Immigration Minister. But naturally the consequences of all that only came due because of Islamophobia.

Muslims have gotten too comfortable sweeping a lot under the rug by crying Islamophobia. But that implies that they actually wish to be part of a tolerant multicultural society, where everyone’s rights are respected. By their actions and agendas however, that is not the society they wish to be a part of. Neither in Ridyah, Tehran, Gaza, Karachi or London, Paris and Detroit.

It is up to Muslims themselves to decide what role they wish to play abroad and in the global culture. They can be intolerant fanatics who stay at home and expect everyone else to stay at home too. Or they can be open and tolerant enough to live side by side with others. But they can’t be intolerant fanatics who expect us to be tolerant and open toward their fanatical intolerance. Not on our dime.

That is the problem, and it is a Gordian Knot that Muslims can either try to untie themselves, or someone will wind up cutting through it for them.

Swedish victim,
Muslim gang rape
(photo from:
IRIS BLOG)

Multiculturalism has wittingly or unwittingly turned out to be the most sexist, most prejudiced form of fascism… Whoa hold it there, you say gently reader. I know you are thinking that was one idiotic, ignorant prejudiced statement, right?!?!? Was it? How many honor killings have those professing Islam committed throughout the West, just in in the last five years? How much intolerance and total disreespect towards the West have they shown, both in the West and in their own lands? In Sweden the number of rapes has grown in geometrical proportions ever since the number of Muslim immigrants has increased, and not coincidentally the overwhelming percentage of rapists profess Islam as their religion!

For those who naively believe that Islamists living in the West will come to embrace our culture as much as you embrace theirs, for those of you who naively believe that everything above is merely fear mongering, for those of you who believe that while there may be a few bad apples masquerading as Muslims, just like there are despicable mysogynists right here in the West, Muslims regard women as equal let me cross-post something from my friend Punx, over at The Liberal Heretic:

Play: Choose the Correct Curse, I Mean Verse, In the Quran

Play Choose the Verse (and sura): First, you must imagine you’re a faithful Muslim, and as the man in the family, you’re responsible for the moral behavior of the women you’re related to. In keeping with this age old tradition, you must choose the correct sura in the Quran to appropriately punish your charges should they shame your proud name and honor.

1.) Have a spare wife you want to get rid of, and you hate her enough to want to punish her for the rest of her life? Don’t bother with divorce, accuse her of lewdness. Imprison her in solitary confinement, never to hear another human voice or ever have contact with another person until she goes insane and dies! All you need are 4 good buddies to concur that she is indeed guilty of lewdness…or you just have to swear it’s true. Choose the sura:

a.) Sura XXIV, 60

b.) Sura IV, 11

c.) Sura IV, 15

If you chose a or b, you shall never enter Paradise, you vile infidel! Every good Muslim knows the answer is c.

*Sura IV, 15: If any of your women are guilty of lewdness, Take the evidence of four witnesses among you, Against them; and if they testify, CONFINE THEM TO HOUSES UNTIL DEATH DO CLAIM THEM.

2.) Follow up to number 1. You have accused your wife of lewdness, but you have no witnesses willing to support your accusations. Not a problem, choose the sura that will get you out of this sticky situation

a.) Sura XXIV, 6

b.) Sura III, 3

c.) Sura II, 220

If you chose b or c, you’re the son of a mangy camel! Every good Muslim man knows the Quran guarantees that if no “witnesses” can be found, just the word of the man is good enough in its book.

*Sura XXIV, 6: And for those who launch accusations against their spouses and have no evidence but their own, Their solitary evidence can be received if they bear witness four times With an oath by Allah, That they are solemnly telling the Truth.

3.) After disposing of that pesky wife (above), you still have 3 more. One is young and beautiful, so you don’t really want to get rid of her, but she CAN be a pain. Didn’t she just yesterday suggest that you take Mohammed Blvd. instead of Allah Way as a shortcut to the bazaar? How dare she? Choose the correct verse to support your discipline regimen.

a.) Sura II, 241

b.) Sura III,3

c.) Sura IV, 34

I know all you faithful Muslim men got this one right. Obviously it’s c.

*Sura IV, 34: As to those women on whose part ye do fear disloyalty and ill-conduct, Admonish them, Refuse to share their beds, and beat them; but if they return to obedience, seek not against them Means of annoyance…

Thank you for playing Choose the Curse.

Will my female readers acquiesce and submit to any Muslim masters? No, ladies, my question did not refer to the submissives ones among you; my question was meant for every Western woman who prides herself of being a woman and not just a male plaything.

Will my male readers quietly, passively, sit back and just let IslamoFascism take over and trample on our values, and our lifestyle? On August 17, 1945, George Orwell published Animal Farm. It remains a classic that exposes totalitarianism and how it unobtrusively takes over a society. In Orwell’s allegory the pigs refer to the Soviet Union. In this the early 21st Century the pigs came to represent precisely those who most hate the symbol! The pigs are the IslamoFascists who rail against the West, while enjoying the welfare of Western societies, while living at taxpayers’ expense and using Western freedoms and rights to destroy westerners’ freedoms and rights.

Towards the end of Orwell’s Animal Farm the animal are shocked to see that certain rules have changed, a new one says: All animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others. Every ethnic group, every religious group that ever came to the West, while keeping its major customs and traditional values, managed to successfully integrate into the host society. That is… all except one which refuses to integrate, all except one who aims to take take over and convert or destroy every infidel as they slowly and efficiently subvert western rule of law… The time has come when we must make these pigs understand unequivocally, that in spite of their illusions of grandeur, they are NOT more equal but… they are merely behaving like PIGS!!!!

Chaim

Digg it!

Cross-posted at: Freedom's Cost

Labels: Dhimmis, Islam, IslamoFascism, The Religion Of Peace, Women's Rights

Socialize this!

Personalize this!

Radicalize this!

Posted by Freedom's Cost at 8:43 PM Permalink || |

Sunday, December 23, 2007

The Buying of American Colleges - Miseducation in Academia

Much has been made about lobbying groups and while there has been a growing debate as to who is the most powerful lobbying group (no, gentle reader, it ain’t dem Jooz), we have all but ignored the real and far more dangerous lobbying effort already at work, already successful.

Always on Watch, had the following post a couple of weeks ago, it’s just too powerful and scary to ignore:

Those Saudi Bucks

Image credit
An accounting of the Saudi bucks infused into various universities all around the world has not been forthcoming as to the specificity of the usage of those funds. Isn’t it important to reveal just what impact those billions have had on curriculum and material presented to the next generation of our nation’s leaders?

Read this December 10, 2007 article in the Washington Times. Note that those Saudi bucks may be getting spread around in more places than you’ve heard of! No doubt you’ve heard about Prince Alwaleed’s gift of $20 million each to Georgetown and Harvard universities, but many other institutions have also received substantial amounts of money. Just how is that money being put to use? According to the article (emphases mine),

…Some call the Saudi gift Arab generosity and gratitude for the years American universities have educated the elite of the Arab world. Others say the sheer size of the donations amounts to buying influence and creating bastions of noncritical pro-Islamic scholarship within academia.

“There’s a possibility these campuses aren’t getting gifts, they’re getting investments,” said Clifford May, president of the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies. “Departments on Middle Eastern studies tend to be dominated by professors tuned to the concerns of Arab and Muslim rulers. It’s very difficult for scholars who don’t follow this line to get jobs and tenure on college campuses.

“The relationship between these departments and the money that pours in is hard to establish, but like campaign finance reform, sometimes money is a bribe. Sometimes it’s a tip.”

The $40 million gift from the Saudi donor, Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, was the latest in a tradition that started in the 1970s — Muslim donors pumping millions of dollars into American universities to fund Islamic studies, hire faculty specialists in Islam and fund books and seminars on the world’s second-largest religion.

[…]

At Georgetown, [Prince Alwaleed’s] money was funneled toward its Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding, which was quickly renamed the Prince Alwaleed bin Talal Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding. The center, part of the Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service, trains many of America’s diplomats.

…The center’s aim, according to its mission statement, is to “improve relations between the Muslim world and the West and enhance understanding of Muslims in the West.”

The center’s director, John Esposito, a prolific writer and praised by many as being a national authority on the religion, was severely criticized by several scholars for downplaying the threat of Islamic terrorism in the 1990s when he was a foreign affairs analyst for the State Department.

Mr. Esposito, “more than any other academic, contributed to American complacency prior to 9/11,” Martin Kramer, a fellow at the Olin Institute at Harvard, wrote in a Jan. 2, 2006, commentary on his blog, sandbox.blog-city.com.

“[Mr. Esposito has] proved that he’s still a magnet for Arab and Muslim money,” Mr. Kramer wrote. “Prince Alwaleed apparently decided that while Esposito’s reputation may be dented, the professor still has some value in him.”

Mr. Esposito declined to be interviewed for this article but did defend himself in several e-mails.

[…]

Mr. Esposito said the number of programs sponsored by his center went from 27 last year to 22 this semester alone. The first of three new faculty, Ibrahim Kalin, a scholar on Sufiism and Islamic philosophy, is slated to come on board next fall.

A month before the gift was publicly announced, Mr. Esposito was one of four persons flanking Prince Alwaleed before a photographer at the George V hotel in Paris. It was then that the prince told Georgetown officials of their $20 million windfall — and that Mr. Esposito would oversee how the money was spent.

[…]

“The prince knew very well Georgetown’s in a milieu filled with lobbyists and opinion makers; thus any program of his will exert more influence there than at a university not in a power center like Washington,” Mr. Meyers said. “The grant also gave Esposito a much bigger microphone. When you’ve got a $20 million institute, that amplifies your voice considerably.”

The Saudi Embassy’s press office did not respond to requests for comment on this article, and a spokeswoman for Prince Alwaleed said he was “too busy” to respond.

[…]

In 1979, Saudi Aramco World magazine published a list of recent Middle Eastern gifts, including…$750,000 from the Libyan government for a chair of Arab culture at Georgetown University; and $250,000 from the United Arab Emirates for a visiting professorship of Arab history, also at Georgetown.

In 1986, Saudi arms dealer Adnan Khashoggi donated $5 million toward a sports center to be named after him at American University….

[…]

There are 17 federally funded centers on American college campuses devoted solely to Middle Eastern studies centers and another 30 to 40 that do not receive federal aid, according to Amy Newhall, executive director of the Middle East Studies Association at the University of Arizona. Not counting several positions at Georgetown University, she estimated at least 10 chaired professorships currently funded by Saudis at major universities.

“With all the talk of the Israel lobby, no one talks about the Saudi lobby,” Mr. Meyers said. “There is no counterweight to Saudi influence in American higher education.”

Indeed, Ain-al-Yaqeen reported that King Fahd has spent “billions of Saudi riyals,” around the world.

“In terms of Islamic institutions, the result is some 210 Islamic centers wholly or partly financed by Saudi Arabia, more than 1,500 mosques and 202 colleges and almost 2,000 schools for educating Muslim children in non-Islamic countries in Europe, North and South America, Australia and Asia,” the paper reported.

[…]

Mr. Kramer, also the author of “Ivory Towers on Sand: The Failure of Middle Eastern Studies in America,” says American universities have allowed themselves to be purveyors of Saudi influence and opinion.

“Universities generate ideas, and [Prince Alwaleed] regards one idea — the ‘clash of civilizations” — as positively dangerous to Arabs and Muslims,” he wrote on his Web site, martinkramer.org. “So he has embarked on a grand giving spree, to create academic ‘bridges” between Islam and the West, and specifically between the Arab world and the United States …

“The mind boggles at the possibilities, when you think of the purchasing power of the world’s fifth-richest man,” Mr. Kramer continued. “Of course, this is why we can’t ever expect to get the straight story on Saudi Arabia, Wahhabism and oil from people who operate within Middle Eastern studies. If you want a fabulously wealthy Saudi royal to drop out of the sky in his private jet and leave a few million, you had better watch what you say — which means you had better say nothing.”

Prince Alwaleed, 52, — who slipped from the fifth richest person in 2005 to the 13th this year, according to Forbes magazine — is best known to some Americans as the man who offered $10 million to the victims of the September 11 attacks on the World Trade Center in New York City. That money was rejected by Rudolph W. Giuliani, then the mayor, after the prince scolded the U.S. for favoring Israelis over Palestinians.

[…]

In 2002, [Prince Alawaleed] donated $500,000 to the George Herbert Walker Bush Scholarship Fund, established by the Phillips Academy in Andover, Mass. In 2006, he donated $10 million to the Weill Medical College of Cornell University.

He defends such gifts in interviews, saying that he has financed study programs about American culture overseas, including a $10 million gift to found a Center for American Studies at American University in Cairo and $5.2 million for a similar center at American University in Beirut.

Prince Alwaleed’s Cairo and Beirut projects explain American culture, but according to their Web sites, offer no courses in Christianity — America’s majority religion. Meanwhile, typical courses at the Georgetown center are “Islamic Theological Development” and “Islamic Religious Thought and Practice.”

[…]

“Islamists such as the radical fundamentalists seen with the Saudi Wahhabis exploit American universal tolerance to provide a vehicle for the dissemination of their propaganda free of critique,” [Zuhdi Jasser] said…

The interfaithing street seems to run one way, in Wahhabism’s direction. So much for promoting understanding among various religions on university campuses around the world. Courtesy of the Saudis, of course.

Mark Alexander reminded me yesterday of this little saying: “He who pays the piper calls the tune.” Prince Alawaleed certainly understands the meaning of that proverb, but Western ostriches refuse to pull their heads from the sand.

9/11 is fading into distant memory. We’re lulled into complacency. Meanwhile, Islamification is proceeding quietly as the next generation is being turned into the generation of Islamophilia.

Remember the words of CAIR’s Ibrahim Hooper:

“I wouldn’t want to create the impression that I wouldn’t like the government of the United States to be Islamic sometime in the future…But I’m not going to do anything violent to promote that. I’m going to do it through education.”

Saudi is using education as the sword of Islam. And petro-dollars are funding the process.

You will not find, however, any academic institution that will even think of giving back give these 30 talents of petrodollars. OK, so the resulting education may be tinged with a new version of reality and ugly revisionism… but think of the MONEY!!! All those liberal professors, who so despise the West and its values (capitalism, being chief among the seven deadly sins they profess to oppose) , have no compunctions in accepting millions from those whose interest lies far away from and in direct opposition to “liberal arts.” They have no compunctions accepting millions from those whose only interest is to subvert all free speech, all debate, those who seek to silence anyone who dares question why indoctrination suddenly became synonymous with education.

No doubt these useful idiots (who, meanwhile, are laughing all the way to the bank!) will either be among the first victims of the IslamoFascists when they do take over or they will gladly adapt the new religion as they expect to be rewarded by becoming part of the ruling elite. Henry IV, the first Bourbon king of France was a a devout Huguenot before becoming French King. Since France would only have a Catholic on its throne, Henry converted at Ste. Germain L’Auxerrois because - as he put it - “Paris is well worth a mass!” So much for principles and convictions…

King Henry, however, unlike these so called “academics” who specialize in subverting the very process of education, turned out to be one of the best loved French Kings. Henri le Grand - Henry the Great also known by his subjects as Le Bon Roi Henri - The good King Henry, was genuinely interested in the welfare and religious freedom of his people. His reign became known for its prosperity and relatively peaceful times. Today’s “academics,” however, are much more interested in the pursuit of their particularly leftist agenda than in anything that might remotely resemble education.

Each of these illustrious professors boasts of his/her Marxist and anti Western ideas, but… as they decry capitalism it is they who embraced and adapted every evil deed and method for which the early capitalist moguls - known as the Robber Barons - became infamous. The more things change the more they stay the same! Interesting how today’s Marxist left has adapted the most disgusting and reactionary, greedy, methodology of early capitalism and became the Robbers of Education!

Chaim

Crossposted at: Freedom's Cost

Labels: college, Dhimmis, education, indoctrination, Islam, leftist agenda, liberalism, Saudi Arabia

Socialize this!

Personalize this!

Radicalize this!

Posted by Freedom's Cost at 5:25 AM Permalink || |

Tuesday, August 21, 2007

Women Should Know Their Place! - Along the Road to Eurabia

From The Brussels Journal:

“Women are simply not accepted by the Muslim community,” says Mohammed. “So women had also better not do this work.” Mohammed is my colleague social worker [integration civil servant] in Antwerp’s immigrant quarters. He looks at me gravely. “That is just the way it is, and that is why I prefer not to work with a woman, that simply doesn’t work.” He is complaining about another colleague, a Flemish woman who is his superior.

Mohammed does not think that this mentality about women and work is wrong. In fact, whoever questions this attitude is wrong because it is his culture and belief, which is why he accepts it, he “understands” it and we, Flemings, do not. Consequently we must accept it, until we “understand” as well.

He sighs. Yesterday it came to a clash with his female Flemish superior. Together with a team of mostly immigrant co-workers, she organizes meaningful recreational activities for the mostly Moroccan youths in the neighborhood. The Flemish superior is also close to despair. Working together with Mohammed is not plain sailing.

She has no support from her Moroccan colleagues. On the contrary, slowly but surely she is being frozen out. Whenever she appears in the square several older man gather round her and start speaking the Berber language with her male colleagues. “They want to marry you,” her male colleagues of Moroccan origin laugh, “because we said that you’re not married.” In the evening the men wait for her and bother her, why won’t she? Several girls of Moroccan origin grab her phone. Her Moroccan colleagues look the other way, also when older kids who always start arguments with her kick her shins until they are blue and threaten her.

She did not want to discuss the complete lack of fellowship, the negative attitude of the Moroccan colleagues. Her problem was Mohammed. He didn’t want to work together with her. He walked away during a conversation with her and went to pray in the meeting room, calling on Allah to stand by him in the discussion with a woman! Perplexity on the part of his female colleague.

Naturally she submitted her conflict with Mohammed, and his praying in the meeting room, to the management. Yes, it’s annoying, but now what? The problem was bought before the staff manager. Who, strangely enough, made a completely absurd accusation. Not Mohammed, but rather the female co-worker, had overstepped her bounds. She had threatened Mohammed and provoked aggression.

How? By questioning his actions. Yes, that’s what Mohammed had said. To the staff manager of course. The female colleague stands as if hit by lighting. She doesn’t weigh half as much as Mohammed, she would be mad to wake up aggression by somebody who could wipe her off the map, Mohammed is also a kickboxer, she is not that crazy! She is left with her feeling of powerlessness. Not Mohammed. In this conflict she is getting picked on.

Her complaint about Mohammed’s behavior was not taken seriously anywhere. It should be, since Mohammed discriminates against women in the workplace, he is being accused by female colleagues of sexual intimidation, and above all he doesn’t offer help to a colleague who is being assaulted by the target group. All for the simple reason that women shouldn’t be doing this work, because they are unacceptable for Mohammed and the target group, we must understand that, end of story.

Aaah, yes, the length the West will go for the sake of multiculturalism! There is no interest in culture nor in its multi facets on the side of the minority the West wants to accommodate. Their attitude is unswerving, unbending, uncompromising, it’s their way or no way!

Nobody confronts Mohammed about this utterly wrong attitude towards women. Worse still: the Antwerp authorities assume that by employing Mohammed they have “easier access” to the target group. In fact, the effect is usually the opposite. Mohammed supports the target group, shares a wrong attitude and doesn’t think of doing anything differently.

Because nobody has the courage to approach Mohammed about behavior that would be unacceptable in any other civil servant, we make no progress. Polarization and segregation increase and within a welfare system that employs thousands of social workers we are unable to achieve a change of attitude, which respects everybody regardless of origin, sex or belief.

If the politicians procrastinate any longer, there will soon be huge protest marches in Brussels by everybody who has had enough. Because these disparities disrupt society: not skin color, but the behavior of target groups is why people are being excluded at work, from discos and swimming pools. It is time for everyone who has had enough to get together, in everybody’s interest.

Women have made tremendous strides in the West, though they still have a bit to go. Will we in the West in order to appease a bully that has no interest in our ways, our culture, our lifestyle, send women back into the Dark Ages? Multiculturalism could only work, at best, if all sides are ready to show understanding for each other. Mohammed on his side has no interest in understanding or respecting the other side and yet the western cowards, the suicidal dhimmis who run the Belgian Social Work department defend him, instead of his superior. When crime against women goes up even more than it already has in Belgium, no doubt they will not blame their own complacency, their own lack of forethought, their own fear of confrontation, their own cowardice. Surely they will blame the women, won’t they? That would be the incorrect, disgusting Politically Correct attitude!!!

If Western society intends to be a melting pot as America has been for a very long time, it must demand that the minorities integrate (that does not mean they should abandon their customs, their mores, their ideals!). How? By showing respect and understanding for the majority whose country they immigrated to in search of a better life with more opportunities for happiness and prosperity. Instead what a lot of these immigrants are exhibiting, is an attitude whereby it is OK to take advantage of what the West has to offer, until it can give no more… like a school of leaches feeding on human blood!

Nobody confronts Mohammed about his utterly wrong attitude towards women. Worse still: the Antwerp authorities assume that by employing Mohammed they have “easier access” to the target group. In fact, the effect is usually the opposite. Mohammed supports the target group, shares a wrong attitude and doesn’t think of doing anything differently. Because nobody has the courage to approach Mohammed about behavior that would be unacceptable in any other civil servant, we make no progress. Polarization and segregation increase and within a welfare system that employs thousands of social workers we are unable to achieve a change of attitude, which respects everybody regardless of origin, sex or belief.

What hypocrisy! Does no one have the guts to tell Mohammed that he should know his place?!?!? Where are the women’s organization? Why is their silence so deafening?!?!? Women of the West, stand up for your hard fought rights, before they disappear!

Chaim

Crossposted at: Freedom's Cost

Labels: Dhimmis, Eurabia, Islam, men and women

Socialize this!

Personalize this!

Radicalize this!

Posted by Freedom's Cost at 8:00 AM Permalink || |

Wednesday, August 15, 2007

Religious Dhimmitude

The Jerusalem Post reports:

Dutch bishop suggests calling God Allah

A Dutch Catholic bishop who once said the hungry were entitled to steal bread and advocated condom use to prevent AIDS has made headlines again, this time by saying God should be called Allah.

“Allah is a very beautiful word for God. Shouldn’t we all say that from now on we will call God Allah?” Bishop Tiny Muskens said in an interview broadcast this week. “God doesn’t care what we call him.”

In an interview broadcast on Monday’s edition of current affairs show “Netwerk,” Muskens said he had worked in Indonesia where God is referred to as Allah in Christian services.

But a spokesman for one of the capital’s leading mosques said he was not happy with the statement.

As Islam in Europe says:

Netherlands: Why not call God Allah?

The simple reason - because one speaks Dutch in the Netherlands. God is Dutch (and English), Allah is Arabic. Arabic is a beautiful language, so why not just switch over completely?

Considering who this “bishop” is, considering his past ridiculous stances, we can can label his words as real affronts to the sensibilities of the West. It’s amazing how incorrect these appeasers and Political Correctness activist are, how far they are willing to go to avoid hurting the sensibilities of a minority while they trample with impunity on the rights and sensibilities of the majority. I can not see myself, even for the sake of appeasement, referring to God by any word other than God, except when praying in Hebrew as a proud Orthodox Jew. I also very much doubt that ANY of my CHRISTIAN friends would be willing to refer to Him as “Allah!”

Islam in Europe ends the short post on Bishop Muskens, as follows:

The Bishop of Breda, Tiny Muskens, thinks “Allah” is a beautiful word for God and suggests it from now on. He is aware that using the name “Allah” would be very emotional and therefore he says it must be thought about, prepared and weighed in advance.

“Allah is a very beautiful word for God. Shouldn’t we all say that from now on we will call God Allah?” Bishop Tiny Muskens said in an interview broadcast this week. “God doesn’t care what we call him.”

Catholic World, reports:

Bishop Muskens has a history of creating occasional controversy within the Church. He has broken with Vatican leadership to endorse the use of condoms as a means of preventing the spread of AIDS, and in 2006 he traveled to Uganda to endorse the work of a group called Stop AIDS Now, which emphasized condom distribution.

The Bishop of Breda, became Bishop in 1994 under Pope John Paul II. It would seem to me that his superiors should rebuke and defrock someone who so disregards the Bible whose teachings he is supposed to uphold and help spread. Perhaps then, he’ll convert to Islam in his rush to appease… but… do you think he would live long, if he dared (as a Muslim) advocate condom use to prevent AIDS? What idiocy passes for religion these days!!!

While it is absolutely wrong for the majority to harass or denigrate or otherwise tamper with the customs of a minority as long as these customs do not go against the laws of the majority, it is much worse when a minority’s rules begin to supersede those of the majority. Why? Because, gentle reader, that leads to a dictatorship, to a regime where the majority is ruled by a tyrannical iron-fisted despotic minority!

Tiny Muskens, Bishop of Breda - Netherlands