Thursday, August 09, 2007

We should respect the eating habits of every religion or culture

In my previous article Muslim Dunkin Donuts - No Pork on my Fork, I warned everyone not to hire or deal with Muslims ever because Islam is inimical to the culture of Western Civilization.

Reader Tom Jones left a comment disagreeing with me [I corrected the spelling to make it easier to read]:
In my opinion it is not racial but religious discrimination. By only sponsoring shops that sell pork they are showing favoritism to religions that allow pork and discrimination against religions that forbid pork and the favoritism amounts to discrimination. As a person who is forbidden pork, I resent the corporate policy. It is not only touching pork but the inhalation of pork fumes from cooking and the pork grease on everything I touch, not to mention making me deal with religious hypocrites who still eat pork and claim they are people of G-d, which is forbidden by my religion, we are not to associate with hypocrites, including the hypocrisy of eating pork as a Jew, Muslim or Christian. It is very offensive that I have been subject to pork eaters in order to get a job. What is it about respect that they do not understand? Or is it that serving Lucifer by eating pork, means that they can not get by without doing it?

I mean really how hard is it not to eat pork for the few hours per day a person is at work or at school? And how hard is it not to sell pork in public places? If people must eat pork they should do it only at home out of respect for others. When I drive by a BBQ and the pork fumes coat me or my car and children it offends me and violates my religion, but some don't want to respect this and that should be a crime. Your hypocritical thinking has forced many a religious person to deny their own faith for fear of losing their livelihood and the USA in particular should make this illegal. This is overdue in my opinion!

Read more here.
.
.
.

Labels: , , ,

Socialize this! Personalize this! Radicalize this!

Sunday, February 11, 2007

Arabic Music

1966. I was 21 and waiting to board a bus headed toward the only un-drownable lake on earth, the Dead Sea. When I got on, the Arab driver had the radio tuned to station 677 Jordanian Radio transmitting from Ramallah. A woman was singing this most beautiful song in Arabic. When I finally got off the bus two hours later, she was still singing the same song. It was during this bus ride that I came to love Arabic singing.

As an aside, when I tuned into 677 Jordanian radio during the 6 Day War I found that it stopped broadcasting.

For those who do not know, Arabic is a horrible language to hear spoken - but when sung - it is one of the most beautiful sounds in the world. An analogy would be hearing Italian spoken by the Sopranos and then listening to La Boheme.

Read more here.
.
.
.

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Socialize this! Personalize this! Radicalize this!

Monday, January 01, 2007

Why Trusting a Moderate Muslim is Dangerous


I know that most Muslims are fine people and make fine citizens in most situations.

However, I wonder if we recognize the difficulty Muslims from certain societies face in maintaining any real, practical allegiance to a Western society. There is an issue endemic to Islamic culture that we Westerners tend to overlook in our natural desire to be tolerant and inclusive of Muslims.

The Qur'an and many commentators are explicit to point out that for a Muslim to pledge allegiance to a non-Muslim government is illicit and places that Muslim outside the protection of the Islamic Umma.

S.5:51 “O ye who believe! take not the Jews and the Christians for your friends and protectors: They are but friends and protectors to each other. And he amongst you that turns to them (for friendship) is of them. Verily Allah guideth not a people unjust.”

The classical commentator Ibn Kathir says of this verse “The Blessed and Exalted One forbids to his servants the making of allegiances with the Jews and Christians, who are the enemies of Islam and His people, - fight them of Allah! - then he informs that they are only allies of one another. He then threatens those who practice this (i.e. such forbidden allegiances) saying ‘he amongst you that turns to them for friendship is of them’. He then states directly “That means that those who make allegiances with Jews and Christians are among the hypocrites.”

Maududi is clear in comments saying “In view of the degenerate moral condition of the Jews and the Christians, the Believers have been warned not to make them their friends and confidants. Likewise they should be on their guard against the evil designs of the hypocrites, the disbelievers and the like and should rely on the true Believers alone.”

If a Muslim lives at peace in, or worse still as a citizen of, an avowedly non-Muslim society s/he is subject to the charge of being a hypocrite. Remember that in Qur’anic usage “hypocrite” does not mean merely that one is failing to observe faithfully the dictates of one’s religious faith; it designates those Muslims upon whom the Muslim community cannot rely in times of conflict and war.

The Qur’an directly equates such hypocrites with Jews and Christians:

S.59:11 “Have you not seen those who have become hypocrites? They say to those of their brethren who disbelieve from among the followers of the Book: If you are driven forth, we shall certainly go forth with you, and we will never obey any one concerning you, and if you are fought against, we will certainly help you, and Allah bears witness that they are most surely liars.”

Allah’s command regarding sthese persons is unequivocal: S.9:73 "O Prophet! strive hard against the unbelievers and the hypocrites and be unyielding to them; and their abode is hell, and evil is the destination."

Now how do Muslims square these passages with living within Western societies? Simply by considering their lives in Western lands as missionary (dawa’) in nature, supportive of, and ostensibly, preparatory for jihad.

So what does this mean in practice in our era? Is there a hidden danger here? Should we get paranoid concerning Muslims like our society once was in suspecting the loyalties of Roman Catholics? (Just go back to J.F.K.’s election to see what I mean) While I do believe that there is a certain degree of danger that there could be a kind of jihadist fifth column in a Western society, that does not seem to me to be our biggest worry. History shows us times when loyal Muslim citizens of Western non-Muslim nations existed.

Yet, I think that we would do well at least to be asking ourselves how we could defend against one particular dangerous scenario. Every Muslim, regardless of how moderate his personal views, could well be approached by more jihadist-inclined Muslims and have demands placed upon him. He will be susceptible to these demands because of two powerful influences.

One, he does not wish to be identified with the hypocrites who oppose Allah and his army. He wishes to be a true believer. This moderate Muslim would not easily do a major act of betrayal to his host Western nation, but he is susceptible to emotional manipulation, therefore, in a desire to prove his Islamic bona fides he may well be willing to do things that support the jihadist cause. Would they be overt acts? Probably not, but they may be acts of support that would make an overt attack possible. Therefore, the emotionally/religiously manipulated Muslim represents a potential danger, as he becomes a controllable instrument for jihadi agendas.

Two, jihadists have a long track record of attacking fellow Muslims mercilessly. Algeria’s FIS is a good example of such brutality. This makes even the most moderate Muslim extremely susceptible to coercion. So let’s say that you are a nice Muslim guy with moderate views regarding the sharia’ and no Islamist agenda in mind. You work in a small company where you track shipments. You simply push paper. No big thing. No high clearance CIA stuff. Then one Friday after you are done praying at the mosque a nice young man and his older friend say they want to talk to you. They seem nice, maybe a bit religious, but nice.

The three of you go for a short walk and they tell you that they want you to help them put a simple little package on a certain shipment. You don’t understand at first and tell them that that kind of thing is not your department. Then the older guy of the two smiles and says, “You know that Allah has told us to not make allegiance with the infidels. Our first loyalty must be to Allah and the Umma Islamiyya. We are all called to serve the cause of the holy Prophet.”

You say, “Well I got to go. I got the evening shift.”

The younger man grabs you and spins you toward him. Then he shows you a couple of photos. You immediately recognize your younger sister and your nephews. They live in Cairo (or Beirut, or Casablanca, or Basra etc.). The younger man hisses, “Your sister is very beautiful. I’m sure that her children would be heart-broken if anything happened to her. A car wreck or a group of sexually frustrated deviants can be easily arranged.”

You might fight it. You might not. Anyway, this represents one of the jihadists’ most frightening and dangerous tools. Is our society even grappling with the implications?

S.9:33 “He it is Who sent His Messenger with guidance and the religion of truth, that He might cause it to prevail over all religions, though the polytheists may be averse.”

d.w. pack

Labels: , ,

Socialize this! Personalize this! Radicalize this!

Tuesday, December 26, 2006

Ellison encourages Detroit crowd to be Real Muslims

Keith's Friend, Lou Hussein-Not Obama

Osama Be Hidin' Keith Hakim X Ellison Mohamed

Direct from Dearbornistan: Marching orders! Spoken like a true Democrat but with a dangerous twist.

DETROIT — Speaking in Dearborn, Mich., late Sunday night, the first Muslim elected to Congress told a cheering crowd of Muslims they should remain steadfast in their faith and push for justice.


"You can't back down, you can't chicken out, you can't be afraid, you got to have faith in Allah, and you got to stand up and be a real Muslim," Detroit native Keith Ellison said to loud applause.


"Allahu akbar" — God is great — was the reply of many in the crowd.


...if you, and me too, stick together, if we believe in Allah, sallalahu aleyhi wasallam (meaning peace be upon him), if we turn to the Quran for guidance, we'll find an answer to the questions we have.

I've had a few questions that the Quran has already answered. Which makes me wonder, Mr. Ellison, what kind of real Muslim you mean.

Asking a Muslim to push for something is like fighting a fire with gasoline. And I'm starting to smell smoke...

For more background see Keith Ellison for Dummies!

Can Ian get an Allahu Akbar?

Labels: , , ,

Socialize this! Personalize this! Radicalize this!

Thursday, November 16, 2006

Pakistan Rape Law Angers Islamist

Maulana Fazlur Rahman

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan - Pakistan's lower house of Parliament passed amendments to the country's rape laws Wednesday, ditching the death penalty for extramarital sex and revising a clause on making victims produce four witnesses to prove rape cases.


Consensual sex outside marriage remains a crime punishable by five years in prison or a $165 fine, said a parliamentary official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak to the media.


International and local calls for change intensified after the 2002 gang-rape of a woman, Mukhtar Mai, who was assaulted after a tribal council in her eastern Punjab village ordered the rape as punishment for her 13-year-old brother's alleged affair with a woman of a higher caste.


The amendments — which still must be approved by the Senate — enraged Islamic fundamentalists, but won cautious support from human rights activists, who wanted the controversial laws scrapped altogether.


"We reject it," Maulana Fazlur Rahman, a top Islamist opposition leader, told reporters after the vote, which he described as a "dark day" in Pakistan's parliamentary history.

Rahman and other Islamists vowed to devise a strategy to block Senate passage of the bill. Islamic political groups have previously staged mass rallies to denounce moves by the military-led government deemed contrary to Islam.

This story just shows that not all but that many muslims do not want to be secularized. They think the only correct way to live is to live under Islamic Law that is commanded in the Qur'an. They believe the laws of the country should be the laws of the Qu'ran and apply to all. You may ask what makes these Muslims believe that 4 witness are needed to prove rape? It is in the Quran.

Muhammads wife Aisha was suspected of adultrey and a revelation came from God to Muhammad and cleared Aisha of the charges. God ask the accusers, "Why did they not produce four witnesses? If they could not produce any witnesses, then they were surely lying in the sight of God" (Sura 24:13)

This is where they get the idea that there needs to be 4 witnesses.

Bottom line those that say that this law of having 4 witnesses to a rape is based on the Quran is correct! Muslims that say that this does not exist are in denial or are not aware of this. I have just showed you where it is in the Quran and the Quran is not to be questioned. Also the Quran states that the witness of one woman is only worth half of a man. It takes 2 womens testimony to equal one mans testimony. So therefore A womans word is not equal to a mans. Dont believe me? Just see Quran 2:282 "and call in to witness from among your men two witnesses; but if there are not two men, then one man and two women from among those whom you choose to be witnesses".

So the sad thing is in alot of Islamic countries it is very hard to prove rape. How many Rapes have 4 witnesses? So because of this many women in these countries that go and say they were raped and can not produce witnesses are accused of cheating on there husband! Which this is against Islamic law and punishable. This is even stated in the story above. "Consensual sex outside marriage remains a crime punishable by five years in prison or a $165 fine, said a parliamentary official" So if a woman can not prove the rape with witnesses then she is put in jail for adultery! how sad my prayers are with you women.

Labels: , , ,

Socialize this! Personalize this! Radicalize this!

Tuesday, September 26, 2006

Copy Cat Al-Qaida?

Bomb equipment, al-Qaida literature found in apartment

INDIANAPOLIS -- The Marion County Sheriff's Department arrested a 26-year-old Indianapolis man Friday after they found bomb-making equipment and literature on al-Qaida in his far northside apartment.


Joseph Bagley was arrested on an initial charge of criminal recklessness. He was held Friday morning in the Marion County Jail on $15,000 bond.


Deputies found gas masks, batteries and other bomb components in Bagley's apartment in the 700 block of Lake Nora South Court, according to a police report.


They also found books on Muslim names, understanding United States government documents, and literature on al-Qaida and former Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein's bomb maker, according to records.


Sheriff's department spokesman Capt. Phil Burton said Bagley admitted to mixing the chemicals "for experimental reasons."

"It disturbs us, based on the things we found in his apartment," Burton said.


Police have not yet found evidence that directly links Bagley to a terrorist group, but Burton said detectives seized computer equipment and compact discs from Bagley's home.


"We'll know more after our cyber-crime unit is able to examine the computer," Burton said.


Federal counter-terrorism experts assisted with the investigation, FBI Special Agent Wendy Osborne said. The case is being left to local authorities to investigate, she said.


"We have no reason to believe that he is a terrorism threat," Osborne said.


No real threat here? The only artifact missing is a Quran. Nonetheless, this shows how very easy it would be to get psychos to be "operatives with Christian names" for the American Hiroshima plan.

Labels: , , , ,

Socialize this! Personalize this! Radicalize this!

Contributors

Jihadi Du Jour is actively looking for contributors who are concerned about America's future and are willing to research and post about the fight against Islamic Jihad. If you are interested email us at jihadidujour@yahoo.com

RASTAMAN
MEDIAN SIB
CAREN E
OBADIAH
U. INFIDEL
LAYLA
TODD
BERNIE
DEBBIE

HEIDI

JAY
JAMES
KATHY
JOHN
JOE S.

BETH
ROBERT

DARRELL
CHAIM

Guests: Stan Smith | Leonard Magruder | Random Thoughts @ TROP | Brigitte Gabriel | Annaqed The Critic | Miss Kelly | CENTCOM

Courtesy of Gabrielle--download and use freely

Blogroll Buzz! | Sponsored Buzz!

Featured video


And Blip.TV

Most wanted





Member:
NowPublic