Saturday, May 12, 2007

Iran's Fashion Police Explained



Caution: This video contains truly offensive material...especially if you are not Muslim.

This is a response I made to some comments left on a video about Iran's Fashion Police. Although I have an account on Youtube, and I am all for social networking, I think sometimes it should be dubbed YouStoopid. The great thing about social networks like YouTube is that you are free to express your opinions, even if you don't actually evaluate them against reality. Well here is a little dose of reality from my perspective.

Some folks will get offended at the most retarded things and then turn around and let true offenses go. This video emphasizes the point.

Don't play this with children in the room. Really... You may have some explaining to do yourself!

More Youtube video from Jihadi Du Jour here.

Labels: , ,

Socialize this! Personalize this! Radicalize this!

Posted by Joe S. at 9:38 AM Permalink || |

Tuesday, April 03, 2007

Islam: Is Shari'a Law justice

From Memri:
Why Isn't There a Single Muslim Who Hasn't Heard About the Muhammad Cartoons - While a Belgian Paper's Publication of the Koran is Taken for Granted?

"[The London daily] Al-Sharq Al-Awsat [recently] reported that 'a Belgian paper distributed to its readers free copies of the Holy Koran in French, along with a coupon for [a copy of] the Koran in Flemish, which is the language spoken in the part of Belgium close to the Dutch border. For 15 days, the paper also ran a supplement in which it published a book called Islam Now, presenting the history of Islam up to the modern era. The paper plans to run [a series] of articles on the Islamic faith and its practices: prayer, fasting, charity and the pilgrimage [to Mecca]…'

"When the offensive cartoons of the Prophet [were published], we responded by damaging buildings and campaigning to boycott products. Most [Muslims] continued to purchase these products in secret, or [went on buying them] because they were not aware of their origin. The whole affair [produced nothing more than] slogans which were meant to support [Islam], but which in practice only damaged its reputation.

"When we wanted to explain the value of our faith, [why didn't we launch] social initiatives... or harness our economic resources to inform the world about the noble nature of Islam and shari'a? Nothing [of this sort] was done, except for a few conferences organized by Muslim preachers - and even this came only after the situation had deteriorated.

"These conferences did not have as much impact as the actions of the rabble... the bombing of buildings, the abduction of innocent people, and the murder of peaceful individuals. These spread more quickly and made a greater impression than lectures aimed at changing [the Western perception of Islam]...

Read more »

Labels: , ,

Socialize this! Personalize this! Radicalize this!

Posted by kathy at 12:49 AM Permalink || |

Wednesday, January 10, 2007

The Tale Of Two Nazanins


From the Help Nazanin Fateh website:

On January 3, 2006, 18-year-old Nazanin Mahabad Fatehi was sentenced to death for murder by court in Iran after she stabbed one of three men who attempted to rape her and her 16-year-old niece in a park in Karaj (a suburb of Tehran) in March 2005. She was seventeen at the time. Iran is signatory to international treaties which forbid them to execute any one under the age of 18; however they continue to do so.


The injustice of this case propelled Nazanin Afshin-Jam to take immediate action and start a petition to help save the life of her namesake. The petition now has over 200 000 signatures from around the world.



Since initiating the Save Nazanin Campaign with Mina Ahadi- the Head of the International Committee Against Execution and Stoning- and through the help of other human rights groups and individuals, they have been able to engage the UN, Canadian Parliament, the EU, Amnesty International and others to pressure the Iranian Officials to spare the life of this child.

Please visit this website and sign this petition. You know we talk alot about the injustices in the Muslim world, now let's do something about it.

Labels: , ,

Socialize this! Personalize this! Radicalize this!

Posted by Joe S. at 7:11 AM Permalink || |

Wednesday, December 27, 2006

Islam against Freedom


From everything I have read and researched Islam is not compatible with the western ideas of freedom and democracy. Islam's idea of freedom is freedom from something. Mainly freedom from making decisions. I can see where this would fit in well with some leftists within our own borders. Their idiocy and ignorance leads them to bad decisions which have consequences. They don't like being stupid, nobody does. If Islam takes away this decision making then they are not responsible for what happens. So in simple terms, Stupid people become Islamists.


Based on the history of Islam, representative democracy is also a non player. Islam would like to establish another caliphate. This takes the power away from people and gives it to religious leaders. I wonder if the leftists in our own country will acknowledge a theocracy. Would they be willing to give up their individual freedoms and let someone else make decisions while they choose to live in a theocracy? Remember, these are stupid people.


There is nothing in the koran that would indicate freedom of choice. The book simply comes down to convert or die. If you decide to convert, everything is decided for you. Forgiveness, tolerance, and compassion are not qualities that the koran evokes from mankind. In fact, it's the opposite.


I am not saying anything new. Many people, including myself, came to this conclusion a long time ago. If we want to see what happens to a democratic society when Islam takes over, look to Europe. The most popular name in England is Mohammed, which has surpassed George. Unless there is a drastic change, Europe will be under Islamic control within a few decades. It won't be a calm transition either. Be prepared for the Great Mosque of Notre Dame.


Leftists are not equipped for the upcoming war. This is going to be a religious war, Judeo-Christianity versus Islam. The Secularists, leftists, sociocommunists, agnostics, and atheists will be the wildcard. Most of them will choose to sit on the sidelines and complain. This works to the advantage of the Islamists. If Islam were to win, they would be the first to suffer. They would have no one to blame but themselves. But, as usual, they'll blame someone else anyway.

Labels: , , , ,

Socialize this! Personalize this! Radicalize this!

Posted by What we are at 12:03 PM Permalink || |

Friday, December 22, 2006

Whatever You Do, Do Not Get Lost in Saudi Arabia


Clicking this flag will bring you to a YouTube Video of Saudi
Sharia Law Enforcement--You have been warned!

Saudi Arabia: "Trespasser" Sentenced By Islamic Court To Beheading

Saudi Arabia, purported ally of the West, is as far from the West as a country can be. A story from New India Press demonstrates how alien the country is.

An Indian national, 31-year old Jojo Joseph, wanted to see his wife, who worked as a nurse near Medina. She had just given birth to their son. Mr Joseph, who was based in Jeddah, where he was an employee of an electronics company, traveled towards where he thought his wife was based, and lost his way. He found himself on the road to Medina.

Unbeknownst to Mr Joseph, during the pilgrimage season, this road was forbidden to non-Muslims. He was arrested by police at Al-Azeez, and was hauled before a religious court on Monday. Full of that Islamic tolerance which the Saudis like to promote in the West, the religious court ordered that Mr Joseph should have his head sliced off on Tuesday, merely for "trespassing into a Muslim-only area".

Mr Joseph told his relatives back home in Mariyapuram, India, who contacted Oommen Chandy, leader of the opposition and former chief minister of Kerala state. Chandy contacted the Indian Embassy in Saudi Arabia and various ministers.As a result, the External Affairs secretary managed to convince the Saudi Government that Mr Joseph had merely become lost and had no malicious intent. When the Saudis insist on promoting their religion in the West, and fund groups like CAIR to change the legislation in Muslims' favor, one wonders how they would feel if Muslims were ordered to be decapitated for trespassing on kaffir territory.....

UPDATE: The same story as above is carried by The Hindu, but the Arab News tells a different tale entirely. There are still elements which disturb.The Arab News states that he was a passenger in a taxi, and therefore the taxi-driver should have been blamed for taking "Jojo" into a forbidden area. It reads:There is no recorded incident where a non-Muslim was executed for entering restricted space in Madinah or Makkah. Authorities generally treat these violations in much the same way trespassing is dealt with. In cases where the violation seems accidental, authorities will simply escort the trespasser out of the prohibited zone.

The road to nowhere...
Joseph was arrested and detained for three days after the taxi apparently took the wrong route and strayed into the prohibited zone of the city. The man was rushing to a hospital where his wife had given birth. Persons volunteering as morality enforcers spotted the man's maroon work/residency visa (denoting the carrier is non-Muslim) and called police. Source: Western Resistance

Labels: ,

Socialize this! Personalize this! Radicalize this!

Posted by Urban Infidel at 5:45 PM Permalink || |

Thursday, December 21, 2006

Islamic Law - Police Raid Beauty Parlor


-men arrested for receiving haircuts from women:

BANDA ACEH, Aceh province (AP): Enforcing Islamic law, Indonesian police raided a dozen beauty parlors and arrested 13 beauticians for failing to wear Islamic attire and two male customers for having their hair cut by women, police said Thursday.


Police chief Bahagia Hadi said raids on beauty parlors would be intensified in the Indonesian province of Aceh because such places were often found to be used for prostitution.


Bahagia said police found used condoms during a raid Wednesday in one of the parlors in the capital of the tsunami-ravaged province, Banda Aceh.


The 13 female parlor workers were arrested because they wore tight shirts and jeans but no head scarves, while the two men should have known that Islamic Sharia law states they can only receive haircuts from male hairdressers, he said.


All were released after being admonished by the Sharia Agency,he said.

This is not the first time someone has faced jail time for breaking the "haircut" laws of Islam.

KABUL, Afghanistan, May 22, 2001 - At the Ahmed brothers’ barbershop in the capital city of the world’s most radical Islamic regime, haircuts can be dangerous. The wildly popular Leonardo di Caprio cut, dubbed the “Titanic” by locals, has teen-age boys lining up every day, eager to be transformed into American heartthrobs. But the “Titanic” is a serious offense in the eyes of the Taliban, the staunchly anti-Western Islamic militants who rule this nation. Said Ahmed, the older of the two barbers, has been imprisoned twice for his artistry. But business is business — despite the Taliban.


...the Taliban imposed an unbending brand of Islam on a war-torn nation ruined by civil war and the Soviet invasion more than two decades ago. In today’s Afghanistan, thieves routinely have their limbs amputated. Women, banned from pursuing most careers, are executed for adultery. Pop music and dancing are banned, along with television and videos.


Even kite flying and laughing in public are censured.

In "lesser" important news : Supreme Court overturns terror conviction against Ba'asyir:


JAKARTA (Antara): Supreme Court Thursday overturned a conviction against cleric Abu Bakar Ba'asyir on conspiracy charges in the 2002 Bali bombings.


The cleric has maintained his innocence and denounced the allegations as a plot by Washington to silence his campaign for Islamic law.

Hurray for the Abu campaign! Well, that's enough to make me Islamophobic. And people like this want to pray at our airports? What on earth can they be praying for?

Labels: , , , ,

Socialize this! Personalize this! Radicalize this!

Posted by Joe S. at 6:26 AM Permalink || |

Sunday, December 17, 2006

A Muslim Manifesto for America?


From Annaqed the Critic:

In the now famous words of Pogo, “We have met the enemy and they are us.” If America, the lone superpower, does not hold out against the march of Islam, it will fall into the Dark Ages of Muslim control, a place where born-and-bred Americans like the fashion designer will determine what American women will wear and other Muslims will impose the Sharia law of Islam upon all of us.

The article proposes that it is not as easily to spot this historical shift, as it was...say Luther's 95 thesis. The author points to a fashion article date of October 12, 2006 saying:

When the media begins to find ways to offer up a positive image of Islam, you know they have probably decided that the game is over and we in the West have lost. The American media is expert at showing the white flag of surrender. They have been trumpeting the end of the world for decades now.

I believe it's been going on for much longer than that...but the point is well made.

Labels: , ,

Socialize this! Personalize this! Radicalize this!

Posted by Joe S. at 3:05 PM Permalink || |

Tuesday, December 05, 2006

Pakistan Is Washing Its Face


I don’t know if this is a move to placate the West and the US in particular, but whatever the reason, it’s a mighty good sign.

It’s about damn time at least one muslim country made an effort to appease the West instead of the other way around, after all the havoc they’ve wrought.Now if Iran and a few of the other violent abusers of women will get out of the Stone Age as well and start living in this century, it would make me positively euphoric.

“Pakistan’s government has promised a sweeping new agenda to promote women’s rights in the conservative Muslim country. The announcement comes as Pakistani religious groups protest against a new law that gives women additional protection from rape and sexual discrimination. VOA’s Benjamin Sand reports from the Pakistani capital, Islamabad.

Pakistan President Pervez Musharraf signed the controversial Women’s Protection Law last week, the latest and most significant achievement yet in his self-styled campaign to promote women’s rights in Pakistan. He told a women’s conference in Islamabad on Tuesday that the new law was the first of many steps his government wants to take to protect Pakistani women.
During his nationally televised speech, the president said many more reforms are needed. He says he wants to emancipate women through legislation and that Pakistan needs to eliminate unjust social practices that hinder women’s development.

The Women’s Protection Law amended the country’s long-standing Hudood Ordinances, which required alleged rape victims to produce four male witnesses to substantiate their claims. The new legislation effectively drops the requirement and shifts future rape cases out of Pakistan’s religious courts and into the country’s more moderate civil court system. It also removes the death penalty for women or men charged with having sex outside their marriages.

General Musharraf said his government is now considering new legislation that would eliminate forced marriages, adding that he also hoped to reform the country’s antiquated inheritance laws to protect women’s property rights.

Conservative (read hard-line Islamic) religious groups however remain bitterly opposed to the president’s agenda. Hard-line Islamic leaders say the Women’s Protection Law violates Muslim principles and will lead to a “free sex zone” inside Pakistan. Islamic political parties are calling for nationwide protests and a number of lawmakers have threatened to resign from Parliament.

The president urged women to stand by him however. He said people should vote against any opponents of the new laws during next year’s parliamentary elections.”

Labels: , ,

Socialize this! Personalize this! Radicalize this!

Posted by Rastaman at 2:52 PM Permalink || |

Saturday, December 02, 2006

Religious Freedom...Or Else!


Pope makes final appeal in Turkey for freedom of religion.

A final appeal? To whom?

Istanbul, Dec 02: With a flight of doves freed into the air and a final appeal for freedom of religion, Pope Benedict XVI on Saturday prepared to conclude his eventful four-day trip to Turkey, his first to a Muslim land.


"You know well that the church wishes to impose nothing on anyone, and that she merely asks to live in freedom," the Pope said in his homily during the second and final mass of his trip at the cathedral of the holy spirit here.


"The church's mission is not to preserve power or to gain wealth; her mission is to offer Christ," he said, speaking in French.


In a final reference to relations between Turkey and Europe -- one of the major topics, as it turned out, of his trip here -- Benedict XVI said: "how can we fail to think of the various events which took place here and forged our common history?"


Benedict XVI released four doves as a symbol of peace into the air at the entrance of the Cathedral and once inside, met ecumenical patriarch Bartholomew I, who hosted the Pope at a St. Andrew's Day orthodox mass here yesterday and ushered him to his pew.


Both men have made a priority of working for rapprochement between their respective churches, which have been estranged for nearly 10 centuries.


A smiling Benedict XVI was greeted at the gates of Istanbul's main catholic church by a group of children playing tambourines and chanting his name.


He was applauded several times as he walked into the Cathedral.

Warning : Average Islamic Violence

At least the Eastern Orthodox have the right attitude. My feeling is much different regarding the attitude of the Muslim's "Overlordish" approach to the Pope's visit in Turkey. Where the Pope faced Mecca with them, I won't hold my breath to see them geneuflect before an altar anytime soon.

It has to be religious freedom for the world or...it will be Sharia Law. Now, for those who worry about the religious freedoms of the flying Imams and the Muslim Congressman remember the religious freedoms that the "religion of pieces" allows and imagine what America's future will be like if we keep "bending over" for them...kind of like the guy in this clip.

Labels: , , , , ,

Socialize this! Personalize this! Radicalize this!

Posted by Joe S. at 11:26 AM Permalink || |

Thursday, November 16, 2006

Pakistan Rape Law Angers Islamist

Maulana Fazlur Rahman

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan - Pakistan's lower house of Parliament passed amendments to the country's rape laws Wednesday, ditching the death penalty for extramarital sex and revising a clause on making victims produce four witnesses to prove rape cases.


Consensual sex outside marriage remains a crime punishable by five years in prison or a $165 fine, said a parliamentary official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak to the media.


International and local calls for change intensified after the 2002 gang-rape of a woman, Mukhtar Mai, who was assaulted after a tribal council in her eastern Punjab village ordered the rape as punishment for her 13-year-old brother's alleged affair with a woman of a higher caste.


The amendments — which still must be approved by the Senate — enraged Islamic fundamentalists, but won cautious support from human rights activists, who wanted the controversial laws scrapped altogether.


"We reject it," Maulana Fazlur Rahman, a top Islamist opposition leader, told reporters after the vote, which he described as a "dark day" in Pakistan's parliamentary history.

Rahman and other Islamists vowed to devise a strategy to block Senate passage of the bill. Islamic political groups have previously staged mass rallies to denounce moves by the military-led government deemed contrary to Islam.

This story just shows that not all but that many muslims do not want to be secularized. They think the only correct way to live is to live under Islamic Law that is commanded in the Qur'an. They believe the laws of the country should be the laws of the Qu'ran and apply to all. You may ask what makes these Muslims believe that 4 witness are needed to prove rape? It is in the Quran.

Muhammads wife Aisha was suspected of adultrey and a revelation came from God to Muhammad and cleared Aisha of the charges. God ask the accusers, "Why did they not produce four witnesses? If they could not produce any witnesses, then they were surely lying in the sight of God" (Sura 24:13)

This is where they get the idea that there needs to be 4 witnesses.

Bottom line those that say that this law of having 4 witnesses to a rape is based on the Quran is correct! Muslims that say that this does not exist are in denial or are not aware of this. I have just showed you where it is in the Quran and the Quran is not to be questioned. Also the Quran states that the witness of one woman is only worth half of a man. It takes 2 womens testimony to equal one mans testimony. So therefore A womans word is not equal to a mans. Dont believe me? Just see Quran 2:282 "and call in to witness from among your men two witnesses; but if there are not two men, then one man and two women from among those whom you choose to be witnesses".

So the sad thing is in alot of Islamic countries it is very hard to prove rape. How many Rapes have 4 witnesses? So because of this many women in these countries that go and say they were raped and can not produce witnesses are accused of cheating on there husband! Which this is against Islamic law and punishable. This is even stated in the story above. "Consensual sex outside marriage remains a crime punishable by five years in prison or a $165 fine, said a parliamentary official" So if a woman can not prove the rape with witnesses then she is put in jail for adultery! how sad my prayers are with you women.

Labels: , , ,

Socialize this! Personalize this! Radicalize this!

Posted by markedmanner at 8:29 PM Permalink || |

Wednesday, November 15, 2006

Pakistan Steps Away from Sharia Law

Don't Get Raped If You Are Muslim-click for video
Pakistan votes to roll back Islamic rape law...

The Islamic laws, known as the Hudood Ordinances, were introduced by a military ruler, President Zia-ul-Haq, in 1979. They made a rape victim liable to prosecution for adultery if she could not produce four male witnesses to the assault.


The main amendment approved on Wednesday takes rape out of the sphere of religious law and puts it under the penal code. That does away with the need for male witnesses and will allow convictions to be made on the basis of forensic and circumstantial evidence.


The amendment bill must be approved by the upper house of parliament before it becomes law.

Is there any reason to doubt it?
Click to read about this victim's blog.







If passed it will definitely be a step in the right direction. Earlier this month--the 4 witnesses were in the car, the 5th filmed it, and she STILL got 90 lashes.

Labels: , ,

Socialize this! Personalize this! Radicalize this!

Posted by Joe S. at 3:54 PM Permalink || |

Wednesday, October 25, 2006

Muslim leader blames women for sex attacks

Hello Kitty!Mullahs gone wild! This is not a joke...it is a RAMADAN sermon by an Aussie top cleric!

Australia--The nation's most senior Muslim cleric has blamed immodestly dressed women who don't wear Islamic headdress for being preyed on by men and likened them to abandoned "meat" that attracts voracious animals.


In a Ramadan sermon that has outraged Muslim women leaders, Sydney-based Sheik Taj Din al-Hilali also alluded to the infamous Sydney gang rapes, suggesting the attackers were not entirely to blame.


While not specifically referring to the rapes, brutal attacks on four women for which a group of young Lebanese men received long jail sentences, Sheik Hilali said there were women who "sway suggestively" and wore make-up and immodest dress ... "and then you get a judge without mercy (rahma) and gives you 65 years".


"But the problem, but the problem all began with who?" he asked.


The leader of the 2000 rapes in Sydney's southwest, Bilal Skaf, a Muslim, was initially sentenced to 55 years' jail, but later had the sentence reduced on appeal.


In the religious address on adultery to about 500 worshippers in Sydney last month, Sheik Hilali said: "If you take out uncovered meat and place it outside on the street, or in the garden or in the park, or in the backyard without a cover, and the cats come and eat it ... whose fault is it, the cats or the uncovered meat?


"The uncovered meat is the problem."


The sheik then said: "If she was in her room, in her home, in her hijab, no problem would have occurred."


He said women were "weapons" used by "Satan" to control men.


"It is said in the state of zina (adultery), the responsibility falls 90 per cent of the time on the woman. Why? Because she possesses the weapon of enticement (igraa)."


Hmmm...I had this same discussion with a fundamentalist Christian friend over the question of thongs at the beach.

Uncovered meat, indeed.

Somehow I don't think this is exactly the same thing as it is not likely that the thong wearer would get raped, TRIED, AND HANGED for brandishing the "weapons of enticement".

Hat tip to HotAir.com.

Labels: , , , ,

Socialize this! Personalize this! Radicalize this!

Posted by Joe S. at 7:39 PM Permalink || |

Monday, October 23, 2006

Man Charged with Smoking and Drinking During Ramadan


A BAHRAINI man was arrested after he was seen smoking and drinking alcohol in his car during Ramadan fasting hours in Manama, it was revealed yesterday.


Police spotted the man smoking as he was driving his car, said a Public Prosecution spokesman.


The defendant was asked to stop and when the officer searched the car, he found an open bottle of alcohol hidden under his seat, he said.


The medical examination of alcohol count in his blood was negative, he added.


The man was released on BD50 bail, after being charged with eating and drinking during Ramadan.


An alcohol count of negative? And he's still charged? Not with smoking and drinking but EATING and drinking. And yet UK police can't arrest someone WITH AN ARREST WARRANT at prayer time? Such mixed priorities...I'm confused. But not much.

Labels: , , , ,

Socialize this! Personalize this! Radicalize this!

Posted by Joe S. at 3:48 AM Permalink || |

Sunday, October 15, 2006

Muslim Clerics Reaching Out To The Pope

From Random Thoughts @The Religion Of Peace:

This is almost more than we can stomach. Twice now we've come across the news headline "Muslim Clerics Reach Out to the Pope" to describe an open letter by 38 Muslim scholars to Benedict XVI in response to his suggestion that Islam has a violent history. One would think that the pope is a lonely or deeply disturbed man, needing the company of others to set him straight in his ways as these scholars are so graciously doing.


In fact, the letter was sent the day after Muslims in Iraq beheaded a Priest after holding him and torturing him for two days because they were angry at the Pope's words. They not only cut off his head, but his other limbs as well. There is no mention of this in the letter. Perhaps it occurred too late for the scholars to incorporate it into their text. Fair enough.


But wait! There is no mention of the Catholic nun who was gunned down at a children's hospital by a disgruntled Muslim nearly a month earlier or the other Christians who were killed around the same time. As a matter of fact, there is no mention at all of any of the brutal acts of violence that the Islamic religion pours out on the world each and every day.


Instead, the letter is a study in narcissism, trumpeting the virtues of Islam while blatantly failing to apologize for or even acknowledge its crimes past or present.


This is the reality of the Muslim world today. It is deeply self-consumed and emotionally immature, so willing to blame anyone but itself for the smallest of problems by which it is affected, while pathologically incapable of taking responsibility for the horror that it inflicts on others.


Yes, there is a dialogue that desperately needs to take place, but it is within Islam itself.


Yes Indeed! Self-consumed and emotionally immature. So Allah and Mohammed trump all other prophets and expressions of God? Even to the condesending (and murdering) of all other religious leaders? I guess that's ok in their view. Remember this?

Anjem Choudary said, "The Muslims take their religion very seriously and non-Muslims must appreciate that and that must also understand that there may be serious consequences if you insult Islam and the prophet.


"Whoever insults the message of Mohammed is going to be subject to capital punishment."


He added: "I am here have a peaceful demonstration. But there may be people in Italy or other parts of the world who would carry that out.


"I think that warning needs to be understood by all people who want to insult Islam and want to insult the prophet of Islam."


As well as placards attacking the Pope such as "Pope go to Hell", his followers outside the country's principal Roman Catholic church also waved slogans aimed at offending the sentiments of Christians such as "Jesus is the slave of Allah".


Suppose we just say Death to the Mullahs (scopes be upon them) for insulting religion in general! They are so easily insulted that the joke is now not will they be insulted but with what?


Robert Spencer On The Muslim Veil-with added footage!




First the image of the prophet, then the message of the prophet, now the hijab of the prophet...What next, the hilal food of the prophet?

Labels: , , , , , ,

Socialize this! Personalize this! Radicalize this!

Posted by Joe S. at 8:44 PM Permalink || |

Sunday, October 08, 2006

Al Qaeda Cricket Fan Calls Off Terror Plot

The former chairman of Cricket Australia, Bob Merriman, says he knew nothing of a plot to attack the Australian and English teams during last year's Ashes tour.

It has been alleged the men who bombed the public transport system in London last year had originally planned to target cricketers from the two countries.


An unnamed friend of one of the four bombers has told The Sunday Times in Britain that the bombers were plotting to kill the players using sarin gas inside their change rooms.


The paper says the order was allegedly made by Al Qaeda at a terrorist training camp in Kashmir.


The plot is understood to have been stopped because one of the bombers was a cricket fan.

Too bad there weren't any soccer fans to call off the Soccer Jihad of this summer.

MOGADISHU, Somalia (AP) -- Radical Islamic militia fighters in central Somalia shot and killed two people at the screening of a banned World Cup soccer broadcast while dispersing the crowd of teenagers watching it, an independent radio station reported Wednesday.


The Islamic fighters, who have banned such entertainment, opened fire after the teenagers defied their orders to leave the cinema that was screening the Germany-Italy match, Shabelle Radio reported. It said the dead were a girl and the cinema owner.

I guess it's not all "Sharia and Sharia alike..."

Labels: , , , ,

Socialize this! Personalize this! Radicalize this!

Posted by Joe S. at 9:16 PM Permalink || |

Contributors

Jihadi Du Jour is actively looking for contributors who are concerned about America's future and are willing to research and post about the fight against Islamic Jihad. If you are interested email us at jihadidujour@yahoo.com

RASTAMAN
MEDIAN SIB
CAREN E
OBADIAH
U. INFIDEL
LAYLA
TODD 		BERNIE
DEBBIE
HEIDI
JAY
JAMES
KATHY		 JOHN
JOE S.
BETH
ROBERT
DARRELL
CHAIM

Guests: Stan Smith | Leonard Magruder | Random Thoughts @ TROP | Brigitte Gabriel | Annaqed The Critic | Miss Kelly | CENTCOM

Courtesy of Gabrielle--download and use freely

Blogroll Buzz! | Sponsored Buzz!

Featured video


And Blip.TV

Search


Most wanted

Last posts

Recommended

More books from
Jihadi Du Jour

Honest Reporting

Archives

Blogroll

Subscribe to this blog's feeds

Add to Google

LiveMessage Alerts

Subscribe in Bloglines

Add to Google

Digg!

Add to My AOL

Subscribe in Rojo

Add Jihadi Du Jour to Newsburst from CNET News.com

Who wants to kill us and why!


Member:
Blogcritics Magazine




Member:
NowPublic