Wednesday, May 28, 2008

Writing is also a bomb: The Moderate Muslim Threat

Malika El Aroud by her computer in her living room at her home in Brussels in April. The Arabic banner on the wall translates as: There is no God but Allah and Mohamed is his Messenger. (Hazel Thompson for The New York Times)
Malika El Aroud by her computer in her living room at
her home in Brussels in April. The Arabic banner on
the wall translates as: There is no God but Allah and
Mohamed is his Messenger.

Photo: (Hazel Thompson for The New York Times).

I have written many times that the greatest threat to Western Civilization is not al Qaeda or Muslim terrorists; it is your common, ordinary, average, moderate Joe or Jane Jihadi. The moderate Muslim does not blow up school buses or train stations or hospitals. The moderate Muslim does not slit the throats of Jews living peacefully in France. As brutal as these acts of terror may be, Civilization will continue and flourish despite the loss of a few hundred poor souls slaughtered by radical Islam.



But the real danger is in fact actually the moderate Muslim who, when offended by all that is infidel, demands that those offenses be removed or destroyed. In the civilized world we call those things science, women's rights, learning, free-speech, art, progress, technology, and freedom of the press. Islamic Scholars have even demanded that the West pass laws to criminalize insults to Islam.


Read the rest here.
.
.
.

Labels: , , , , ,

Socialize this! Personalize this! Radicalize this!

Tuesday, July 17, 2007

Masterful Doublespeak?

Muslims, or at least their self appointed spokesmen are totally incapably of finding fault within themselves. Everything bad that may be happening to them, any inconvenience, is caused not by their own attitudes and lifestyles but rather by those infamous infidels who are so incomprehensibly Islamophobic. What a great way to deal with a problem! Don’t you think so, gentle reader?

Today’s Washington Times has an article entitled Bush office is anti-Muslim, group says:

A Muslim civil rights group today blamed Bush administration policies for promoting “Islamophobia” and said the “war on terror” won’t stop terrorists.

“The new perception is that the United States has entered a war with Islam itself,” said Parvez Ahmed, chairman of the national board of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR).

“Terrorism is a tactic. You cannot eradicate it by declaring a war against it. The war on terror is causing us infinitely more harm than the terrorists could have ever imagined.”

Yes, gentle reader, if you shift the problem’s focus from the cause to the effect the problem goes away... doesn't it? I seem to have learned otherwise but - hey - I’m just another infidel!

You cannot eradicate it [terrorism] by declaring a war against it, I agree! Do you know why? As long as the “war against terror” is not an all encompassing war against any terrorism anywhere around the globe, it remains merely a declaration, merely a bumper sticker… in spite of its tremendously high cost. You can only eradicate terrorism by fighting it on its own terms, using its own tactics and weapons.

Mr. Ahmed, who spoke at CAIR symposium at the National Press Club, said the war against terrorists is driven by an “irrational” fear that the Bush administration has inculcated in the American public. The chance of being killed in a terrorist attack, he said, is 1 in 80,000 over a lifetime.

Would Dr. Parvez Ahmed be man enough to look in the eye of a husband or wife, father or mother, son or daughter of any of the victims of 9/11 and repeating that ludicrous statement? Below is a chart of the fatalities of that infamous day:

Fatalities (excluding hijackers)
New York City World Trade Center 2,603 died and another 24 remain listed as missing
American 11 88
United 175 59
Arlington Pentagon 125
American 77

59

Shanksville United 93 40
Total 2,974 died and another 24 remain listed as missing.

The youngest victim in the hijacked planes was 2, on Flight 175, the oldest was 82 on Flight 11. In the buildings the youngest person was 17, the oldest 89… The Wikipedia says: According to the Associated Press, the city identified over 1,600 bodies but was unable to identify the rest (about 1,100 people). They report that the city has “about 10,000 unidentified bone and tissue fragments that cannot be matched to the list of the dead.” Bone fragments were still being found in 2006 as workers prepared the damaged Deutsche Bank Building for demolition. The average age of all the dead in New York City was 40. […]All of the fatalities were civilians except some of the 125 victims in the Pentagon. Would Mr. Ahmed care to repeat his idiotic “statistics”?

“It is important to bear in mind that terrorists cannot destroy America,” he said as a member of a panel discussing the symposium theme, “Attacking Islam: Implications for Social Cohesion and U.S. Relations with the Muslim World.” The U.S., he said, is too powerful and too resourceful for terrorists to destroy.

Does he mean, therefore, that America should get used to such minor annoyances as 9/11 and do nothing to stop any possible re-occurrence? It certainly would make life a lot easier for the terrorists if we just got used to the idea. There would be nothing to stop them from killing more Americans and eventually they'll come to dominate us by the sheer power of fear… Hmmm, I see! Do you think, gentle reader, that perhaps we should heed Ahmed’s words? Maybe he’s right… why should we interfere with terrorists? Just let the boys do their job unhindered!

The Bush Administration’s policies in Iraq has driven a deep wedge between Muslim’s and non-Muslim people in the United States, he said.

“Policies driven by fear will be naturally irrational. Thus in this state of irrationality the Bush administration often through their surrogates have resorted to fear-mongering. This has unleashed a vicious cycle, one in which fear leads to bad policies and bad policies lead to more fear.”

Hmmnnn… so Americans have no reason to fear terrorists, they are just a bunch of nice mischievous boys playing with explosives, hijacking planes, blowing up American embassies in Africa… just for some clean fun… they really mean no harm! Oh, silly me! To think I was ready to believe they really were a threat!

“The popular discourse in America today remains mired in stereotypical denouncements about Islam. As a result Muslims and their faith remained misunderstood, feared and shunned.”

If Ahmed truly believes that Americans have a wrong perception of people of his religious creed, perhaps he might start by telling the terrorists PR agents that they are projecting the wrong image… Oh, wait! They are only following the basic tenets of the religion of peace submission, as their extremist Imams care to interpret it. Hmnnn… perhaps, Parvez Ahmed, chairman of the national board of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) is merely engaging in some masterful doublespeak. Will it fly, or will the people see through the lies?


Dr. Parvez Ahmed, chairman of the national board of the
Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR)
(Photo from: Anti-CAIR)

Chaim

Cross-posted at: Freedom's Cost

Labels: , , ,

Socialize this! Personalize this! Radicalize this!

Friday, July 13, 2007

Jihadi Family suspended from YouTube


youtubetakferi.jpg

The above Jihadi family’s account has been suspended at YouTube. The YouTube jihadi trash whose video gloating over the beheading of Daniel Pearl turns out to be a member of the “Islamic Thinkers Society” in Queens, New York.

ytvideo.gif

LGF has the complete scoop here. Allahpundit writes, “Wow. Is the Jew Watch cretin next?”

This is right up their with Michael Moore’s “Sicko.” They are all sick and depraved.

Labels: , , ,

Socialize this! Personalize this! Radicalize this!

Tuesday, May 15, 2007

The Media And The Fort Dix Six


From the New Media Alliance, Inc.:

Left Works to Change Image of Fort Dix Six
by Sher Zieve


Although I still have difficulty fathoming why the secular Left seems
bent upon suicide-by-proxy, at least it has told us who (if not what)
comprise the members of its substitution group. They are the Islamists.
However, in the case of Islam’s most recent failed attempt to cause an
act of barbarism on US soil, many on the Left seem furious with their
adopted protégés. In statements that appear designed to spur them on
toward accomplishing their terroristic missions, the Left has called the
Islamists “idiots” and “morons” for not actually completing
their massacre mission at Fort Dix, NJ. The popular anarchistic left-wing
site Daily Kos reflects this disdain for the jihadists’ failed plan
to slaughter soldiers stationed at Fort Dix. One of its writers/bloggers
states: “It’s a bit like the Shriners planning to win the Daytona
500 with a clownmobile.” The writer then goes on to compare this
recent Islamist attempt to one planned by the 1970’s militant group the
Weather Underground.



In an attempted attack on Fort Dix, members of this group blew
themselves up prematurely. Perhaps the Daily Kos is not aware of the current
myriad Islamist attack attempts, worldwide, in which the terrorists not
infrequently blow themselves up prematurely. But, the Left has
seldom-to-never been accused of basing its opinions or even news articles on any
discernable coherent facts.



Then, there is the ABC News article titled “The Fort Dix Six
Allegedly Had Bomb Recipes, Made Fun of U.S.”, in which the usual friend of
one of the terrorists is interviewed and says “He was an easy going
guy, someone you enjoyed working with.”—the indication being
‘terrorists can be great guys, too’!



The Courier-Post Online quotes George Strong, a retired William and Mary University professor, as saying the Fort Dix Six are “romanticists.” Do we now have apolitically-correct new word to use for avowed terrorists? Are they no longer to be called what they truly are but, to be referred to as “romantics?” I predict that there will soon be a new ACLU-and-CAIR-fought-for-law that bans the usage of the
word “terrorist” and replaces it with “romanticist.”


Following this same leftist-inspired thought pattern, will the term
‘terrorism’ soon be replaced with ‘love’? The Courier-Post goes on to
extensively quote Chicago Muslim leader Huseyin Abiva as strongly indicating
that the United States is to blame for the Fort Dix mass murder attempt. Huseyin said
that the 1999 American intervention in Serbia is to blame, when he
stated: “A lot of these foreign missionaries [presumably he believes Christian missionaries] and soldiers started propagating this alien interpretation of Islam.”


Huh? First of all, I don’t recall any Christian
clerics being sent to Serbia to “convert” the Muslim population.
Second—to what “alien interpretation of Islam” is Huseyin referring?


With all of the ongoing worldwide terrorist attacks perpetrated by the followers of
Islam, it appears that this political system and religion (neither of
which can be separated from the other) speak for themselves.


In his “style” of continuing to play down any and all Islamist
threats, we have MSNBC’s Uber-leftist Keith Olbermann telling his handful
of viewers on the same day the on-our-soil Islamists were arrested:


“The FBI arrested six morons.” As other leftists, Olbermann seems
genuinely angry that the would-be terrorism plotters did not accomplish
their goal. And, tragically, it’s no surprise that NBC would allow (and
most likely fully support) the seemingly anti-US and pro-terrorist
ideology that Olbermann appears to embrace. The inherent insanity of this sort of
support for enemies of the United States is that should the Islamics
accomplish their stated goal of world domination, leftists will also either
be killed or forced to convert to Islam. Do these leftists hold even
one coherent and rational thought in their collective mind? From their
comments and actions, I think it’s doubtful. However, as they are a
suicidal bunch, perhaps being “offed” is their hope.



The left-wing Democrat propagandists and their media continue to blame
the United States of America for everything that is wrong with the
world. And, of course, President Bush is responsible for all of the
problems—even those that did not occur on or during his watch. But, even
though he’s often the wrong target, President Bush is the easy one to
scapegoat—as he seldom fights them back. However, if the voting,
reading and viewing public continues to allow this never-ending “blame
America first,in the middle and last” mentality—we will very soon be destroyed
from both within and without. It appears that this is what both the Left
and the Islamists are hoping for and working toward.



Do you have any plans to repeat the 2006 midterm results by also
sitting out the 2008 elections?



References:

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/5/11/171939/816

http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/story?id=3159638&page=1

http://www.courierpostonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID
=/20070513/NEWS01/705130373/1006


http://www.olbermannwatch.com/archives/2007/05/glenn
_beck_unlo.php




Sher Zieve is a staff writer for the New Media Alliance, Inc.
(www.thenma.org). The New Media Alliance is a non-profit (501c3) national
coalition of writers, journalists and grass-roots media outlets.

Labels: ,

Socialize this! Personalize this! Radicalize this!

Friday, May 04, 2007

The Film PBS Doesn't Want You To See



Michelle Malkin interviews Frank Gaffney about the taxpayer-funded film that PBS continues to suppress at HotAir.com.

FRank Gaffney give the whys and hows about how a corporation YOU fund with your taxes can suppress a truthful assessment of Islam called "Islam VS. The Islamists". Those of us (like Jihadi Du Jour, Jihad Watch and other anti-jihadist websites) who are alarmed at the threat of the Islamic jihadist and and are educated on it have been trying to get this message out and are constantly getting usurped by a biased and dhimmified media. But we are also taxpayers and can do something about it. Watch this important interview and call the numbers given at the end and help "Free The Film"!

Labels: , ,

Socialize this! Personalize this! Radicalize this!

Friday, April 20, 2007

Jihadist video shows boy beheading man


Hot off the presses: Sick, twisted, and disgusting!

So whats new?

KILI FAQIRAN, Pakistan - The boy with the knife looks barely 12. In a high-pitched voice, he denounces the bound, blindfolded man before him as an American spy. Then he hacks off the captive's head to cries of "God is great!" and hoists it in triumph by the hair.

A video circulating in Pakistan records the grisly death of Ghulam Nabi, a Pakistani militant accused of betraying a top Taliban official who was killed in a December airstrike in
Afghanistan.

An Associated Press reporter confirmed Nabi's identity by visiting his family in Kili Faqiran, their remote village in southwestern Pakistan.

The video, which was obtained by AP Television News in the border city of Peshawar on Tuesday, appears authentic and is unprecedented in jihadist propaganda because of the youth of the executioner.

Captions mention Mullah Dadullah, the Taliban's current top commander in southern Afghanistan, although he does not appear in the video. The soundtrack features songs praising Taliban supreme leader Mullah Omar and "Sheikh Osama" — an apparent reference to
Osama bin Laden, who is suspected of hiding along the Afghan-Pakistan border.

The footage shows Nabi making what is described as a confession, being blindfolded with a checkered scarf.

"He is an American spy. Those who do this kind of thing will get this kind of fate," says his baby-faced executioner, who is not identified.

A continuous 2 1/2-minute shot then shows the victim lying on his side on a patch of rubble-strewn ground. A man holds Nabi by his beard while the boy, wearing a camouflage military jacket and oversized white sneakers, cuts into the throat. Other men and boys call out "Allahu akbar!" — "God is great!" — as blood spurts from the wound.

The film, overlain with jihadi songs, then shows the boy hacking and slashing at the man's neck until the head is severed.

A Pashto-language voiceover in the video identifies Nabi and his home village of Kili Faqiran in Baluchistan province, which lies about two hours' drive from the Afghan border.

A reporter went to the village, and Nabi's distraught and angry father, Ghulam Sakhi, confirmed his son's identity from a still picture that AP made from the footage. He said neighbors had told him the video is available at the village bazaar, but he had no wish to see it.

Sakhi said his son had been a loyal Taliban member who fought in Afghanistan and sheltered the hard-line Afghan group's leaders in the family's mud-walled compound.

He blames the Taliban and wants to avenge his son's death.

"The Taliban are not mujahedeen. They are not fighting for the cause of Islam," the 70-year-old said. "If I got my hands on them I would kill them and even tear their flesh with my own teeth."

Qari Yousaf Ahmadi, who claims to speak for the Taliban, told AP he had no information about Nabi or the video. None of the group's commanders he contacted could confirm the execution, he said.

The method of Nabi's death was not unusual for Pakistan's lawless tribal regions. Suspected informers are regularly found beheaded and dumped along the side of the road in the lawless, mountainous regions along the Afghan-Pakistani border where al-Qaida and Taliban militants find sanctuary.

But such al-Qaida-style killings are rarely featured in the Taliban's increasingly frequent propaganda videos. The use of a child to conduct the beheading stands out even among those filmed by militants in
Iraq.

"This is outright barbarism," Iqbal Haider, secretary-general of the independent Human Rights Commission of Pakistan, said after viewing the video. "Whosoever has committed this, whether they are Taliban or anybody else or any Afghan or al-Qaida or anybody, they are enemy No. 1 of the Muslims."

The video accuses Nabi of responsibility for a U.S. airstrike that killed Mullah Akhtar Mohammad Osmani, who was regarded as one of the top three associates of Omar, the Taliban supreme leader. He was hit while traveling by car in Afghanistan's Helmand province Dec. 19.

Osmani was the highest-ranking Taliban leader to die since the U.S.-led invasion of Afghanistan that ousted the hard-line regime in late 2001 for refusing to hand over bin Laden following the Sept. 11 terror attack on the United States.

The U.S. military said at the time that Osmani's death was a serious blow to militant operations, and
NATO commanders said this week that a feared spring offensive had yet to materialize.

Sakhi, a retired mosque preacher with a long gray beard, spoke unashamedly of his son's Taliban affiliation and wept twice during an interview in his simple home at the foot of a mountain valley in Baluchistan province.

He said Nabi fought against the anti-Taliban Northern Alliance that helped U.S. forces to victory in Afghanistan.

After returning to Pakistan, Nabi ran a religious school in the Baluchistan capital of Quetta and had regularly sheltered both Osmani and Dadullah at the family compound, the father said.

He said Nabi also bought weapons for Taliban fighters and organized medical treatment for those injured during fighting in Afghanistan.

Some days after Osmani's death, Nabi went to Peshawar and then to Wana, a tribal town considered a militant stronghold, to collect money from Taliban officials to buy guns and food for militants in Afghanistan, Sakhi said.

He said his son called at the end of January to reveal that a tribal council had sentenced him to death on charges of tipping off U.S. forces about Osmani's movements, despite his denials.

His son passed the phone to Dadullah, but the militant leader ignored his pleas for clemency, Sakhi said.

"I talked to him and said you visited us and my son was a close friend so why are you going to hang him? He just said, 'How are you?', and switched off the phone," Sakhi said.

"They are the enemies of Islam," he said of the Taliban. "They are behaving like savages."

Sam Zarifi, Asia research director for Human Rights Watch, said the use of a child to commit such an act constituted a war crime and was a "new low" in the conflict in Afghanistan.

He noted the Taliban had teenage combatants but they were not recruited on a large scale because of the availability of adult fighters. He said he had seen children in the background of some jihadist videos but none in which they were directly involved in violence.

"I don't know why they would do this," Zarifi said. "The Taliban have to some extent tried to play to the public in Afghanistan and have not engaged in the complete sowing of mayhem that we have seen in Iraq. But this kind of act is really egregious. It's off the charts."


I now have no complaint against American Youth!

Labels: , ,

Socialize this! Personalize this! Radicalize this!

Saturday, February 24, 2007

Pakistan Clerics Denounce Suicide Bombings... Well Not Really

I came across this story yesterday out of Pakistan about Islamic clerics denouncing suicide bombings. Sounds good on the surface but a closer look shows something different. It boils down to that they denounce the use of Suicide bombings against innocent civilians but that it can be used as a military tactic. So in their eyes it is totally understandable for someone to blow themselves up as long as it is under an enemy tank or in the presents of enemy soldiers. How sick that really is. But then again the Islamic material art school teaches this very thing in Australia and maybe even here in the United States. Here are a few noteworthy lines from the story:


Former minister Dr Mehmood Ahmad Ghazi said: “A suicide attack is clearly murder and its legality is further called into question by the fact that they occur in a Muslim state which is not occupied by infidels.”

In other words it would be ok if infidel were in the land.


Ahmed said that no final decree could be given on the issue, since a suicidal defence strategy was employed by the Pakistan Army at Chawinda to repel an Indian attack during the 1965 war, a strategy that was approved by the religious scholars of the time.

This is where they justify the use of suicide bombers as a military tactic. Sickening!

Determining the moral status of such suicide attacks is far too complex an issue to be sorted out by a mere ‘yes’ or ‘no’, he said: “After all, what can a Palestinian do when his parents and children have been killed, his house demolished and he has no means of earning a living any more?

First of all to insinuate that just because someone is poor they have to blow themselves up is absurd. This is something you are taught. Not to mention studies have found that most radical Muslims are very well educated and not poor.

Labels: , , , ,

Socialize this! Personalize this! Radicalize this!

Thursday, February 22, 2007

Legal Jihad training for terrorist?




I came across an organization called Silat Mubai International. They
claim to offer Islamic Martial Arts training. There website is at
http://www.silatmubai.com/home.htm

One thing I found interesting was their statement on terrorism.
Here is a quote from their statement against terrorism:
"Muqawama (Resistance) operations and Martyrdom operations against
foreign occupation forces in Muslim lands are what we consider to be
legitimate Military operations as long as they are confined to enemy
personnel and not directed at the civilian population. "


So I guess they believe Suicide bombings are ok as long as it is only
used against occupying countries? Also it would seem with the above
statement they could justify attacks on US soldiers in Iraq. As well even though he may condemn the act on the World Trade Center he could probably justify the attack on the Pentagon since it is a military facility.

Also on their message board someone asked about Muslims fighting along
side non-Muslims this is the response they received to the question:
"It has been done. It is not standard operating procedure but it is
possible depending on what the Mujahideen commanders in a given
situation feel they need. And if you have something particularly
useful they need. But I do think you would be hard pressed to get
inside any Military/Paramilitary group if you're an outsider, whether
a Muslim group or not."

You can see the post yourself here:
http://data.forumhoster.com/forum_rcagonline/index.php?showtopic=690

Also when asked about Suicide Bombings this was the response:
"Martydom Operations: These are part of classical Islamic Military
actions and are completely permissible in Islamic Military law and
seen throughout our history as noble deeds of the Shuhada (Martyrs) up
to the time of the Sahaba (Companions of the Prophet).

1. In Martyrdom Operations the Maqtal (target) is a Military one or
enemy combatants.

2. The intention is to kill as many of the enemy in the operation as
possible while only expending the life of one person, the Shaheed
(Martyr).

3. Civilians or civilian places like restaurants, bus stops, hotels,
can never be considered valid targets of a Shaheed.

Martyrdom Operations (MO) are an invaluable tool of the Mujahideen
(Warriors) and have been used successfully in War for centuries by our
people."

You can read the whole thing here:
http://data.forumhoster.com/forum_rcagonline/index.php?showtopic=413

The leader of this group also justifies attacks by the Mujuhideen in
Iraq on US troops:
"If there are those Mujuhideen who decide to join their brothers in
Iraq to fight against the occupation forces, then they are justified
in doing so to relieve the people of foreign occupation and to
institute a proper Islamic government, God Willing. No one can stop
them from going to fight to protect the lands of Muslims who are being
attacked. It is their right to do so and as long as they follow the
guidelines of the Warrior Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him,
then they will win by martyrdom or by victory. One as excellent as the
other."

You can read the whole thing here:
http://data.forumhoster.com/forum_rcagonline/index.php?showtopic=292

The leader of this organization is named Ustaz Hussein. Apparently
this group has training facilities in Australia and they have a
website setup for them here: http://www.mubai.com.au/

I am trying to see if this group has any training facilities in the US
but I haven't had any luck as of yet. Just thought all of this info
maybe of use to you maybe. I am very worried about this group and what
they could be teaching...

You can also read more about this HERE

Labels: , ,

Socialize this! Personalize this! Radicalize this!

Friday, December 01, 2006

Muslims Seek Prayer Room in Airport

It seems we are surrounded by attempts to turn America into a muslim state at every turn. We all recall the Flying Imans of last week. We know that we now have a muslim Congressman who is insisting on taking his oath of office with a koran. (Thanks Wisconsin).

After the Flying Imans pulled their little stunt last week and then got all the media headlines by accusing everyone of racism, some imans are expressing 'concern' that there isn't a place for them to pray and meditate in airports.

AP
Airport officials said Friday they will consider setting aside a private area for prayer and meditation at the request of imams concerned about the removal of six Muslim clerics from a US Airways flight last week.


Steve Wareham, director of Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport, said other airports have "meditation rooms" used for prayers or by passengers who simply need quiet time.


A group of Somali clerics met with airport officials Friday and said they would attract less attention if they had a private area for prayer. Devout Muslims pray five times daily, facing the holy city of Mecca.


"When we pray, we don't want a problem. We don't want what happened last week," said Abdulrehman Hersi, an imam at Darul-Quba mosque in Minneapolis, referring to six clerics who were barred from a US Airways flight in Minneapolis after drawing the concern of some passengers.


Airports in Nashville, Tenn.; Columbus, Ohio; and Fort Lauderdale, Fla., all advertise meditation rooms. Fort Lauderdale's is billed as "For travelers seeking a quiet time." All note they are nonsectarian.


The imams at the airport Friday drew a few stares as they laid down their prayer rugs and knelt on the hard rubber floor at the airport.


The clerics requested a meeting after both the US Airways incident and a recent flap over Muslim cabdrivers who didn't want to pick up passengers carrying alcohol.


"We are users of the airport, too, and we don't want to get into a situation where Muslims feel we are being marginalized at the airport," said Omar Jamal, executive director of the Somali Justice Advocacy Center in St. Paul and the meeting's organizer.


Airport officials will accept the group's invitation to visit a mosque, airport spokesman Pat Hogan said.


"I think there's a mutual recognition that it would be helpful for there to be a solid understanding," Hogan said.

Are we so afraid of being accused of being racists that we will turn our country over to these people who are demanding we completely change our culture to benefit them? While we are bending over backward to keep from giving the appearance of intolerance, they are creeping in and taking over.

What if I demand there is a United Methodist room in every airport so I don't to be around Catholics, Jews, Muslims, Hindus or other Protestants? I'll tell you what. I would have the ACLU all over me and be told I was an intolerant racist. THAT wouldn't be tolerated. Period.

We are facing a jihad on many different levels. Direct assaults as well as the more subtle assaults on our culture and way of life here. And still the American people refuse to see what is happening right in front of us. Still we go about our business as though nothing has changed and we are still the America we once were. No worries.

God help us.


crossposted: Blue Star Chronicles

Labels: , , , , ,

Socialize this! Personalize this! Radicalize this!

Monday, November 13, 2006

John Conyers And The Muslim Caucus

Conyers & SheehanThis is another lesson in the you get the government you deserve.

This is pretty scary stuff. We have people in Congress who put party above country. Even worse, we have people in Congress who put their own enrichment above anything else, even the safety of the country.

Our allies around the world have a lot to be worried about right now. Will we do to Iraq what we did to South Vietnam? If the dems have their way we will. Will we defend our friends? Not if we won't even defend ourselves.

Does John Conyers believe the alligator will eat him last or does he believe there isn't an alligator at all? Wasn't he here on September 11, 2001? Doesn't he know the threat? Or is he just burying his head in the sand? Perhaps he's just made a deal with the devil.

Whatever the case, we are in for a rough ride. The undermining has already begun. The playing of political games is started without regard for the consequence to our country. I am fearful for the fight we have ahead of us.

Investment.com

Congress: The likely new chairman of the House Judiciary Committee says he's just fighting bigotry in leading a Democrat jihad to deny law enforcement key terror-fighting tools. But he is in the pocket of Islamists.

John Conyers, son of a leftist Detroit union activist, represents the largest Arab population in the country. His district includes Dearborn, Mich., nicknamed "Dearbornistan" by locals fed up with cultural encroachment and terror fears from a steady influx of Mideast immigrants.

Conyers, who runs an Arabic version of his official Web site, does the bidding of these new constituents and the militant Islamist activists who feed off them. They want to kill the Patriot Act and prevent the FBI from profiling Muslim suspects in terror investigations. They also want to end the use of undisclosed evidence against suspected Arab terrorists in deportation proceedings.

And the 77-year-old Conyers has vowed to deliver those changes for them.

"The policies of the Bush administration have sent a wave of fear through our immigrant communities and targeted our Arab and Muslim neighbors," he growls.

He'll soon be in a position to act on his promises. And he has the full backing of the expected speaker of the House. Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., wants to criminalize FBI and Customs Service profiling of Muslim terror suspects.

"Since Sept. 11, many Muslim Americans have been subjected to searches at airports and other locations based upon their religion and national origin," she said. "We must make it illegal."

Conyers, a lawyer by trade, last decade pushed through a bill to help stop what he called "DWB," driving while black. He dubs post-9/11 profiling "flying while Muslim."

Pelosi has also promised Muslims she'll "correct the Patriot Act," one of the most valuable tools the FBI has in ferreting out jihadist cells lurking in Muslim communities.

Conyers is one of the top recipients of donations from the Arab-American Leadership PAC.
And not surprisingly, he has a long history of pandering to Arab and Muslim voters.

During the first Gulf War, for instance, Conyers fought FBI outreach efforts in the Arab and Muslim community in Detroit that were designed to gather intelligence on potential cells and protect the home front. Conyers and other Detroit-area Democrats at the time, David Bonior and John Dingell, threatened to hold hearings unless the FBI stopped counterterrorism interviews.

The FBI met with them privately to explain the national security benefits of outreach, but could not allay their concerns. In the end, the FBI backed off. Today, Hamas, Hezbollah and the al-Qaida-tied Muslim Brotherhood are all active in the area.

Expect Conyers and Pelosi to kick open the doors of Congress to Islamists from the Council on American-Islamic Relations and other militant groups. They will have unfettered access, even though many of their leaders have been tied to terrorism (some CAIR officials have landed in the big house).

In 2003, Conyers hosted the first dinner on the Hill that celebrated the end of Ramadan for such Muslim leaders. It's now a tradition. Incoming Democrat freshman Keith Ellison, a Louis Farrakhan disciple and first Muslim member of Congress, will no doubt expand the invitation list.

Conyers has also sponsored one of the Islamists' favorite bills in Congress. HR 635, which has 40 co-signers, would create a select committee to investigate President Bush for allegedly manipulating prewar intelligence and torturing al-Qaida detainees. The goal of his bill is to build grounds for impeachment.

Conyers led the defense of Bill Clinton in last decade's impeachment hearings and is clearly out for blood. So are many of the constituents he serves.


h/t Stuck on Stupid.

crossposted at Blue Star Chronicles

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Socialize this! Personalize this! Radicalize this!

Contributors

Jihadi Du Jour is actively looking for contributors who are concerned about America's future and are willing to research and post about the fight against Islamic Jihad. If you are interested email us at jihadidujour@yahoo.com

RASTAMAN
MEDIAN SIB
CAREN E
OBADIAH
U. INFIDEL
LAYLA
TODD
BERNIE
DEBBIE

HEIDI

JAY
JAMES
KATHY
JOHN
JOE S.

BETH
ROBERT

DARRELL
CHAIM

Guests: Stan Smith | Leonard Magruder | Random Thoughts @ TROP | Brigitte Gabriel | Annaqed The Critic | Miss Kelly | CENTCOM

Courtesy of Gabrielle--download and use freely

Blogroll Buzz! | Sponsored Buzz!

Featured video


And Blip.TV

Most wanted





Member:
NowPublic