Tuesday, July 24, 2007

Overstaying their Welcome?

Naharnet has the following about how public opinion is starting to turn against the Palestinian “refugees” in Lebanon:

Nahr al-Bared Battle Fuels Anti-Palestinian Sentiment
As the list of dead soldiers grows, anger mounts in villages of north Lebanon where the army has been locked in a deadly showdown with Islamist militants for more than two months.

Black-clad women shout angrily as men in sombre mood sit in heavy silence next to portraits of the “martyred” soldiers in impoverished villages in the remote north — a main reservoir for the country’s armed forces.

Elite unit soldier Bassam Jawhar, 29, was killed on July 14 during the ongoing battles around Nahr al-Bared refugee camp where Fatah al-Islam militants have been under army siege since May 20.

He was killed when a booby-trapped building collapsed on a patrol in Nahr al-Bared and it took the army six days to retrieve his body from under the rubble due to the intensity of the battles.

Like Jawhar, six other soldiers from Bebnin fell in combat in Nahr al-Bared in two months.

At his family home in the village, his widow Mariam, wearing a black dress and an embroidered headscarf, sits near the giant portrait of the “Shahid” (martyr in Arabic) standing proudly in full combat gear and holding a rocket-launcher.
“I delivered our baby the day he left, 50 days ago exactly,” said Mariam, 23. “He only saw the baby twice.”

Why was Jawhar killed? Because pro Syrian/Iranian militias from within the refugee camp decided to flex muscle, to flaunt how little they care for Lebanon… or for their own people, for that matter.

In another room, the grandfather holds his newly-born granddaughter in his arms as an endless queue of men flock in to present their condolences.

The procession takes place in silence, but anger is boiling.

“Don’t say Fatah al-Islam, it is an insult to Islam. Say ‘the criminal gang of Shaker al-Abssi,’” the Islamist group’s commander, said Mohammed Jawhar, a cousin of the slain soldier.

Across the dusty villages of the impoverished northern province of Akkar, the men enroll in the country’s armed forces by local tradition but mostly by necessity.

“There is not a single house where there is no soldier,” explained 42-year-old Zeina Sufain, who lost her 19-year-old son Firas on May 22.

“There is no work here. Even for those who go to school,” she said.

The list of soldiers killed in Nahr al-Bared has painfully reached 116, including 27 servicemen on the first day of the clashes when the Islamist extremists attacked most of them in their beds.

116 soldiers died defending their country from the enemy… within. Yes… the enemy is within Lebanon, within the refugee camps which for about 40 years now have been independent enclaves where neither the Lebanese police nor the Lebanese Army were allowed to go in, by mutual agreement, and this is their show of gratitude…

Reports of “massacres” against off-duty soldiers by Fatah al-Islam, including harrowing stories of servicemen executed at gunpoint or slaughtered with knives seemed to have at least momentarily ended decades of good relations with the Palestinian refugee camp.

“Let them go to hell,” shouted Sahar, Bassam’s aunt.
“We will never let the camp be rebuilt. We will never accept that the Palestinians come back. We used to buy from their shops, but they are traitors. They harbored these criminals, they helped them,” Mohammed Jawhar said.

“Some of them even married their girls to the terrorists” from Fatah al-Islam, shouted another man.

But despite their grief and great losses, Akkar villages continue to back the army and its military campaign on Nahr al-Bared.

“In Akkar we love the army,” said a cousin of one of the slain soldiers in Bebnin.

But in a poor house further down the street, Zeina Soufain voices rare criticism of the army.
“They sent them (soldiers) there (to Nahr al-Bared) like cannon fodder. They had no experience, and they only had a Kalashnikov,” she said.

Back at the Jawhar reception hall, a soldier came to present his condolences before returning to Nahr al-Bared after a six-hour leave, his first in 14 days.

“Morale is high, even the wounded soldiers want to return” to the battlefront, the soldier who did not wish to be identified told Agence France Presse.

“With our meagre means, we are combating a very well-trained enemy that kills with unbelievable savagery,” he said.

The soldier said the army was surprised by the “very sophisticated arms” of Fatah al-Islam which he said had “high-precision rifles, infra-red goggles and remote-controlled landmines.”

He said the soldiers “stay three days in the camp. They take turns to sleep. Then they leave and others replace them.”

Over the last few months we saw not only Palestinians fight savagely, ruthlessly, against Palestinians (Hamas vs. Fatah), we see them fight with the same hatred and ferocity against Lebanon, a country that extended its hospitality… Yes, gentle reader, you may argue that Lebanon, like Syria, like Jordan, like Saudi Arabia, like Egypt, did everything possible to keep them poor and unable to integrate into regular society. Let’s not forget however that only Lebanon gave the Palestinian camps sovereignty over their own land, and to what results?

Naharnet also reported today:

Army Seizes Explosives during Raid on Militants’ Shelter
The Lebanese army on Tuesday continued to tighten the noose around diehard Fatah al-Islam militants, pounding the northern Palestinian refugee camp of Nahr al-Bared with heavy artillery barrages. It The army’s guns bombarded the remaining Islamists’ pockets at the camp with long range artillery fire.

It said troops occasionally fought fierce house-to-house battles with the militants.

The state-run National News Agency said the Lebanese army on Tuesday also seized explosive materials as well as weapons, detonators and electronic devices during a raid on a shelter inside the camp on the outskirts of the northern port city of Tripoli.

It said a number of militants were killed in the attack.

NNA said troops also blocked most exits to a sanitary sewer system after they discovered that it had been used as routes of escape by the terrorists

There was no word on casualties from Tuesday’s fighting. NNA said the army’s guns bombarded the remaining Islamists’ pockets at the camp with long range artillery fire.

It said troops occasionally fought fierce house-to-house battles with the militants.

They do not let up, they are intent in dying and killing. Bloodshed seems to be all they care about! Can a people that embraces such a culture, endure long?

The only Arab country that actually welcomed them and gave them everything necessary to integrate them into their own society was Kuwait. What happened in Kuwait during Saddam’s invasion on August 2, 1990? Who turned out to be Saddam’s greatest cheerleaders in Kuwait? Those same Palestinians that had been received with open arms… such gratitude!

Unless the Palestinians choose a leadership that truly represent the healthy aspirations of the average man on the street, unless they are willing to lay down their weapons, get rid of their hatred against all and everyone they are destined to forever remain a world pariah. Will the plight of Palestinians continue to be dismal or will they succeed in bettering themselves and their future? The choice is theirs!

Chaim

Crossposted at: Freedom's Cost

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Socialize this! Personalize this! Radicalize this!

Tuesday, July 17, 2007

Masterful Doublespeak?

Muslims, or at least their self appointed spokesmen are totally incapably of finding fault within themselves. Everything bad that may be happening to them, any inconvenience, is caused not by their own attitudes and lifestyles but rather by those infamous infidels who are so incomprehensibly Islamophobic. What a great way to deal with a problem! Don’t you think so, gentle reader?

Today’s Washington Times has an article entitled Bush office is anti-Muslim, group says:

A Muslim civil rights group today blamed Bush administration policies for promoting “Islamophobia” and said the “war on terror” won’t stop terrorists.

“The new perception is that the United States has entered a war with Islam itself,” said Parvez Ahmed, chairman of the national board of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR).

“Terrorism is a tactic. You cannot eradicate it by declaring a war against it. The war on terror is causing us infinitely more harm than the terrorists could have ever imagined.”

Yes, gentle reader, if you shift the problem’s focus from the cause to the effect the problem goes away... doesn't it? I seem to have learned otherwise but - hey - I’m just another infidel!

You cannot eradicate it [terrorism] by declaring a war against it, I agree! Do you know why? As long as the “war against terror” is not an all encompassing war against any terrorism anywhere around the globe, it remains merely a declaration, merely a bumper sticker… in spite of its tremendously high cost. You can only eradicate terrorism by fighting it on its own terms, using its own tactics and weapons.

Mr. Ahmed, who spoke at CAIR symposium at the National Press Club, said the war against terrorists is driven by an “irrational” fear that the Bush administration has inculcated in the American public. The chance of being killed in a terrorist attack, he said, is 1 in 80,000 over a lifetime.

Would Dr. Parvez Ahmed be man enough to look in the eye of a husband or wife, father or mother, son or daughter of any of the victims of 9/11 and repeating that ludicrous statement? Below is a chart of the fatalities of that infamous day:

Fatalities (excluding hijackers)
New York City World Trade Center 2,603 died and another 24 remain listed as missing
American 11 88
United 175 59
Arlington Pentagon 125
American 77

59

Shanksville United 93 40
Total 2,974 died and another 24 remain listed as missing.

The youngest victim in the hijacked planes was 2, on Flight 175, the oldest was 82 on Flight 11. In the buildings the youngest person was 17, the oldest 89… The Wikipedia says: According to the Associated Press, the city identified over 1,600 bodies but was unable to identify the rest (about 1,100 people). They report that the city has “about 10,000 unidentified bone and tissue fragments that cannot be matched to the list of the dead.” Bone fragments were still being found in 2006 as workers prepared the damaged Deutsche Bank Building for demolition. The average age of all the dead in New York City was 40. […]All of the fatalities were civilians except some of the 125 victims in the Pentagon. Would Mr. Ahmed care to repeat his idiotic “statistics”?

“It is important to bear in mind that terrorists cannot destroy America,” he said as a member of a panel discussing the symposium theme, “Attacking Islam: Implications for Social Cohesion and U.S. Relations with the Muslim World.” The U.S., he said, is too powerful and too resourceful for terrorists to destroy.

Does he mean, therefore, that America should get used to such minor annoyances as 9/11 and do nothing to stop any possible re-occurrence? It certainly would make life a lot easier for the terrorists if we just got used to the idea. There would be nothing to stop them from killing more Americans and eventually they'll come to dominate us by the sheer power of fear… Hmmm, I see! Do you think, gentle reader, that perhaps we should heed Ahmed’s words? Maybe he’s right… why should we interfere with terrorists? Just let the boys do their job unhindered!

The Bush Administration’s policies in Iraq has driven a deep wedge between Muslim’s and non-Muslim people in the United States, he said.

“Policies driven by fear will be naturally irrational. Thus in this state of irrationality the Bush administration often through their surrogates have resorted to fear-mongering. This has unleashed a vicious cycle, one in which fear leads to bad policies and bad policies lead to more fear.”

Hmmnnn… so Americans have no reason to fear terrorists, they are just a bunch of nice mischievous boys playing with explosives, hijacking planes, blowing up American embassies in Africa… just for some clean fun… they really mean no harm! Oh, silly me! To think I was ready to believe they really were a threat!

“The popular discourse in America today remains mired in stereotypical denouncements about Islam. As a result Muslims and their faith remained misunderstood, feared and shunned.”

If Ahmed truly believes that Americans have a wrong perception of people of his religious creed, perhaps he might start by telling the terrorists PR agents that they are projecting the wrong image… Oh, wait! They are only following the basic tenets of the religion of peace submission, as their extremist Imams care to interpret it. Hmnnn… perhaps, Parvez Ahmed, chairman of the national board of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) is merely engaging in some masterful doublespeak. Will it fly, or will the people see through the lies?


Dr. Parvez Ahmed, chairman of the national board of the
Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR)
(Photo from: Anti-CAIR)

Chaim

Cross-posted at: Freedom's Cost

Labels: , , ,

Socialize this! Personalize this! Radicalize this!

Wednesday, July 11, 2007

Politically Correct Speaking

No one but a most reprehensible bigot would claim that every Muslim is a terrorist. Such a generalization would not only be untrue but it would also be undeniable proof of the speaker’s despicable racial prejudices. Neither can it be denied, however, that in every major terrorist event around the world over the last few years… the perpetrators were all Muslims!!! Today’s International Herald Tribune reprints an article by Jeff Jacoby from The Boston Globe, where he decries Political Correctness and the incorrectness of its results:

Is radical Islam connected to terrorism? Notable British voices spoke out on that subject after Britain’s recent terrorist near-misses - the two unexploded car bombs in London’s West End and the fiery SUV rammed into the main terminal at Glasgow’s international airport.

Consider what four of those voices had to say:

One declared that the word “Muslim” must not be used in connection with terrorism, and insisted that even the phrase “war on terror” should be scrapped.

The second likewise cautioned against pointing a finger at Islam, contending that in London, “Muslims are . . . less likely to support the use of violence to achieve political ends than non-Muslims”

The third, asked whether Muslim extremists might be responsible for the attempted atrocities in London and Glasgow, counseled: “Let’s avoid presumptions. . . . It can be the work of Muslims, Christians, Jews or Buddhists.”

Obviously the one who made the first statement has never learned that a disease can only successfully be cured if the treatment deals with the full disease rather with one or two of the symptoms. The second statement, is even more idiotic! There are no Christian priests, no Jewish Rabbis, or Buddhist heads of ashrams preaching violence on British society, or on any elements of that society. Preaching violence is a daily occurrence, however, for some radical Muslim Imams.

In spite of anti Christian, anti semitic, anti Buddhist cartoons constantly appearing in British publications there never were demonstrations (violent or otherwise) against said publications or their cartoonists. Nobody has asked for the heads of the culprits, while Muslims demonstrators have violently demanded just that. No Christians, Jews or Buddhists have ever requested that Britain replace its laws with laws approved by any of these religions, Muslims have in the past and are now violently demanding that Sharia law replace British law. Muslims are . . . less likely to support the use of violence to achieve political ends than non-Muslims?!?!? Methinketh, the particular speaker has seriously misspoken. Don’t you think so, gentle reader? As for the third statement it is disingenuous at best, another blatant attempt at clouding the true facts!

By contrast, the fourth noted the resemblance of the latest terror attempts to “other recent British Islamic extremist plots,” pinpointed “Islamic theology” as “the real engine of our violence,” and described British jihadists as “mindless killers” who have “declared war upon the whole world.”

The first three statements, disingenuous but quite politically correct, were made respectively by 1) Britain’s new prime minister, Gordon Brown; 2) London Mayor Ken Livingstone, and 3) Daud Abdullah, deputy secretary general of the Muslim Council of Britain.

Just days before the second anniversary of the deadly 7/7 London transit bombings, and less than a year since 24 British Muslims were arrested for plotting to blow up passenger jets over the Atlantic, the three men spoke as if they had no inkling that Britain is a battleground in militant Islam’s global jihad - as if only a boor or a bigot could imagine that Muslims might somehow be linked to the car bombs in London and Glasgow.

And the fourth statement? Those were the blunt words of Hassan Butt, a onetime spokesman for the radical Islamist organization al-Muhajiroun, who has renounced his former life.

In an essay published last week in the Daily Mail, Butt emphasized that jihadists are motivated not by opposition to British or U.S. foreign policy but by a fundamentalist theology that seeks to subject the entire world to “Islamic justice.” Radical Imams teach their followers that they must fight for Dar al-Islam (the House of Islam) against Dar al-Harb (the House of War - i.e., infidels to be defeated). And “in Dar al-Harb, anything goes, including the treachery and cowardice of attacking civilians.”

By turning a blind eye to the radical theology of the jihadists, Butt says, mainstream Muslim institutions make it easy for the extremists to recruit new followers. His words apply equally to political leaders like Brown and Livingstone: “They refuse to broach the difficult and often complex truth that Islam can be interpreted as condoning violence against the unbeliever - and instead repeat the mantra that Islam is peace, and hope that all of this debate will go away.”

Wars cannot be won through denial and willful blindness. Yet in ways large and small, Western leaders and institutions deliberately avert their gaze from the reality of the Islamist threat.

The fact remains that most of these Islamic preachers of hatred and violence and most of these violent felons (yes, gentle reader, they use the excuse of religious teachings and extremist interpretations to commit violence and rejoice in it!), came to the West to better their lives, to find opportunities unavailable in their countries of origin. They came to live on the public dole! Ah, what gratitude! Extremist Imams who use every means of emotional and psychological pressure to mold their flock into unthinking robots that can be mobilized for whatever nefarious deed these preachers deem necessary, happen to be also Muslims in spite of what London’s laughingstock Mayor Ken Livingstone may claim.

The UN secretary general, Ban Ki Moon, blames global warming, not Sudan’s jihadist regime, for the genocide being carried out in Darfur. A leading candidate to succeed President George W. Bush, Illinois Senator Barack Obama, maintains a lavish campaign Web site, complete with detailed position papers that have nothing to say about radical Islam’s aggressive war.

For a politician who is running for public office to conveniently ignore an inconvenient truth is, sadly, a part of the political game. For the Secretary General of the UN, to refuse to call it as it is, to refuse to acknowledge the racial cleansing being practiced in Sudan by ethnic Arabs, is criminal. Not only does it in no way alleviate the plight of the victims but his is merely an attempt at grandstanding, by pushing fashionable (though highly questionable) pseudo science as the excuse for unspeakable violence. Shame on you, Ban Ki Moon! UN Secretary Generals may come and go, but things stay the same…

Another candidate, former senator John Edwards, prepares a 5,200-word speech to the Council on Foreign Relations - and devotes just 19 of them to the menace of Islamic extremism.

The obfuscation is sometimes almost comical. The New York Times, reporting the Glasgow attack on Page 1, carefully avoided using the M-word to identify Britain’s Muslim terrorists. Instead it attributed the 7/7 bombings to Britain’s “disenfranchised South Asian population” and reported that the terrorists in Glasgow “were South Asian.” (As Joel Mowbray pointed out for Powerline, Indian Hindus are Britain’s largest South Asian demographic.)

Similarly, seven reporters contributed to AP’s story on the arrested jihad-doctors (”Diverse group allegedly in British plot”), yet somehow missed the radical theology they presumably shared.

Political correctness is no strategy for victory. Islamic fascists will not hate us less if we avoid all mention of the theology that inflames them. Winning the war the jihadists have declared - the war of Dar al-Islam and Dar al-Harb - begins with moral clarity. Denial is a luxury we cannot afford.

Edwards, the “$400 haircut, working man’s candidate” is too vacuous and too much of an airhead to seriously tackle an issue that might alienate some potential voters. Frankly, his chances of being the next Democrat candidate for president are less than mine… and I’ve already made it very clear that I’m not even running!

As for the New York Times risible attempts at journalism… well… a rapidly plunging readership is a very eloquent statement as to that publication’s political slant is worth! Talking about the AP’s Political Correctness… you can rest assured that had the terrorists been Jews or Christians, their religion would not have been omitted. I guess that is because as Jews or Christian we would have been appalled, dismayed and enraged for our co-religionists to have turned to terror and we would waste no time in demanding swift punishment. That is so unlike the M people, isn’t it?!?!?

The word Islam is not derived from salaam - peace, it is derived al-silm which means submission or surrender. Let’s call it like it is gentle readers, Islam is not the religion of peace, Islam is the religion of submission! Between the useful idiots (who in their fashionable hatred and total ignorance reject all the West represents) and the taqiya - deception perpetrated by the IslamoFascists, truth and facts are laid by the wayside, discarded as inconvenient.

Political correctness is no strategy for victory. Islamic fascists will not hate us less if we avoid all mention of the theology that inflames them. Winning the war the jihadists have declared - the war of Dar al-Islam and Dar al-Harb - begins with moral clarity. Denial is a luxury we cannot afford. That is so true! Will any of the politicians in the West, have the courage to stop obfuscating the truth? Hasn’t the time come to eradicate this cancer within, before the whole Western body perishes?

Chaim

Cross-posted at: Freedom's Cost

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Socialize this! Personalize this! Radicalize this!

Wednesday, May 30, 2007

CAIR, Lies and… the Truth

Investors Daily published the following expose on May, the 23rd (H/T: Eye On The World):

Politics And Demographics:

We’ve been told for years that Islam is the fastest-growing religion in America, and that the size of the Muslim population here has swelled to 6 million to 7 million. A new study pops that myth.

The Pew Research Center just concluded an exhaustive scientific study of the size of the U.S. Muslim population. It was able to identify only 2.35 million Muslims [empasis added] — less than half the figure commonly cited by Muslim activists.

Pew, a liberal group with certainly no interest in marginalizing Islam, described its study as “perhaps the most rigorous effort to date to scientifically estimate the size of the Muslim American population.”

Yet it practically apologized for its more accurate reading, being that it came in “significantly below some commonly reported estimates frequently cited by Muslim groups.”

Foremost among such groups is the Council on American-Islamic Relations, which claims to represent Muslims in Washington. CAIR commissioned its own survey in 2001 and came up with 6 million to 7 million, an estimate it always touts in its press releases and on its Web site.

As a result, most media outlets — as well as Congress, the White House and the State Department — have parroted the figure to describe the size of the nation’s Muslim population.

Politicians in Washington are intimidated by the figure, which CAIR uses as a cudgel to help advance its Islamist agenda. They believe it.

But it’s a wildly inflated guess manufactured by CAIR, something the media could have easily refuted all these years if they dared — simply by deconstructing CAIR’s unscientific methodology.

Until now, finding reliable data for Muslims in America has been hard because the Census Bureau does not survey creed. So CAIR’s fuzzy math went unchallenged, even though the “respected scholar” it hired to lead its “study” wasn’t a trained demographer. In fact, as a CAIR board member, he wasn’t even independent.

Worse, the Muslim professor admitted the number he arrived at for CAIR was a “guesstimation” that magically and conveniently matched the size — and potential political clout — of the Jewish population in the country, also estimated at 6 million.

It’s telling that CAIR did not link to the Pew study or any press coverage of it on its Web site. CAIR derives its power from the size of its potential membership. The bigger it is, the more clout it has in Washington and the corporate boardroom.

Until now, the perception was that CAIR spoke for several million Muslims and could rally them to boycott a company or to vote as a bloc to swing an election if it didn’t get its way. Officials feared the group because they thought it could marshal an Islamic juggernaut. The threat alone has caused many to back down from criticism or policies CAIR didn’t like.

But it was the Wahhabi lobby’s big lie. CAIR couldn’t deliver even 2 million voters if it tried. According to Pew, just 1.5 million Muslims are of voting age.

There is no big Muslim lobby, just CAIR’s big, hollow PR machine.

Well folks, Until now, finding reliable data for Muslims in America has been hard because the Census Bureau does not survey creed. So CAIR’s fuzzy math went unchallenged, even though the “respected scholar” it hired to lead its “study” wasn’t a trained demographer. In fact, as a CAIR board member, he wasn’t even independent. Worse, the Muslim professor admitted the number he arrived at for CAIR was a “guesstimation” that magically and conveniently matched the size — and potential political clout — of the Jewish population in the country, also estimated at 6 million. There you have it folks… did you happen to read this phrase: the Muslim professor admitted the number he arrived at for CAIR was a “guesstimation” that magically and conveniently matched the size — and potential political clout — of the Jewish population in the country, also estimated at 6 million? I have no doubt Ibrahim Hooper and the other vile liars from CAIR will now try to sue the Pew Research Center while they’ll put on a nice spin trying to fix whatever damage.

CAIR’s history has been one non-stop story of subversion, support for every IslamoFascist terrorist group around the world and hidden glee when the US and/or Israel suffer losses. Yes, folks I fully support Muslims in America having a voice that represents their interests just like any other minority in this country, however, when the group representing their interests is no more than a front for terrorists support, any true Muslim must question if CAIR truly represents their interests.

As the Wikipedia, in a well documented and balanced article, mentions: CAIR claims that it works to promote a positive image of Islam and Muslims in America through media relations, lobbying, education, and public advocacy. CAIR tries to get a Muslim voice represented in the media, and to present American Muslims’ side of issues in current events. Its members often appear on news programs when a story involves Muslims in America. Over the years, CAIR has become an often-cited source for journalists who are seeking input or a quote from Muslim leaders or the Muslim community. But how does it promote that positive image of Islam and Muslims in America?

CAIR has received criticism from a number of both governmental and non-governmental sources, for actions it has taken and people and organizations it has been involved with. Critics have accused CAIR of having ties to terrorist organizations, and of “pursuing an extreme Islamist political agenda” As of 2006, at least four former CAIR officials have been charged with terrorism-related offenses. Critics claim CAIR is a spin-off of the Islamic Association for Palestine, which is alleged to be a “front group” for Hamas.

Critics have also taken aim at CAIR’s fundraising and sources of funds. Shortly after the 9/11 attacks, CAIR’s website solicited donations for what it called the “NY/DC Emergency Relief Fund.”[16] However, clicking on the donation link led to the web site for Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development (HLF) Later that year, HLF was later designated as a terrorist organization by the European Union and U.S. because of alleged connections to Hamas, and shut down by executive order. CAIR has also been accused of doctoring photographs and reporting fraudulent statistics about the Muslim population of the United States in support of its own private agenda. Finally, another source of criticism is that CAIR attempts to suppress criticism of Islamic terrorism and intolerance through accusations of racism and anti-Muslim bias.

Investor’s Business Daily publicly condemned CAIR as being “the PR machine of militant Islam” after CAIR “dispatched its henchmen” to try to shut down the first Secular Islam Summit.

Among the numerous books donated to libraries in CAIR’s “library project” was former congressman Paul Findley’s ‘Silent No More’, which includes positive statements about convicted terrorist Abdul Rahman al-Amoudi

CAIR claims to represent Muslim interests, yet at least four former CAIR officials have been charged with terrorism-related offenses and pursues an extreme Islamist political agenda. In spite of Ibrahim Hooper, Ahmad Al-Akras, Parvez Ahmad, Christina Abraham and the rest of its vile liars’ tremendous efforts at obfuscating the truth, it is repeatedly being shown as the ally of terror for whom it collects heavy donations as for example in the aftermath of 9/11.

Shortly after the 9/11 attacks, CAIR’s website solicited donations for what it called the “NY/DC Emergency Relief Fund.” However, clicking on the donation link led to the web site for Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development (HLF) Later that year, HLF was later designated as a terrorist organization by the European Union and U.S. because of alleged connections to Hamas, and shut down by executive order. It constantly is shown as doctoring photos and lying about the size of whom it represent. It is estimated that it only has just over 4300 dues paying member that is a dismally low percentage of even the true number of Muslims in this country.

Our politicos have curtsied and jumped at the beck and call of CAIR and the 6 to 7 million it fraudulently claims to represent, all in the name of votes the organizations was never able to deliver and now everyone knows why. I have no doubt that that the good Mr. Hooper and his cohorts will immediately sue the Pew Research Center for showing CAIR as the repulsive dangerous liars they truly are. I also have no doubt that within the next few days Ibrahim Hooper will appear on CNN and other friendly media outlets where he will express “righteous” indignation at the Pew Center’s research.

I fully support the Muslim community’s right to have an organization that speaks for its interests just as I unequivocally support those same rights for every single minority in this country. The question is however whether Muslim are truly represented by liars, supporters of terrorism and criminals (yes, it was criminal and CAIR should have been prosecuted!!!!) who take advantage of American feelings about the worst tragedy on American soil in this country’s entire history. Do the Muslims really want an organization that defrauded the American public at their most vulnerable moment and then gave the money it collected to a terrorist organization, so it can murder more people?

The entire history of CAIR is fraught with deception, anti-Americanism, and subversive activity in the name of an agenda that has little in common with the interests of the average Muslim living here. Perhaps the Muslim community should repudiate as their representatives an organization that is constantly caught lying, doctoring photos and greatly exaggerating the number of people it claims to represent. If Muslim immigrants want to peacefully coexist with the other 99% of Americans, if they wish to be respected rather than suspected, if they wish to have a true voice that will represents their interests and deliver on their community’s needs, then the time has arrived for them to cut any ties with CAIR. The time has come for America’s Muslims to have a voice that cares about them without any hidden agenda.

Meanwhile, together with many other blogs we here will continue to expose the lies, the exaggerations, their fraudulent methods and their real agenda (aiding and abetting terror!!) of CAIR. It is up to those Muslims who care to better their lives, to stop CAIR from using them for their nefarious ends.

Over At Yid With Lid you can also read about a poll the same Pew Research Center (authors of the study above) published a short while ago. He quotes Robert Spencer's post from today’s FrontpageMagazine.com:

Some of the results of the Pew Research Center poll of Muslims in America were startling: twenty-six percent of Muslims between the ages of eighteen and twenty-nine affirmed that there could be justification in some (unspecified) circumstances for suicide bombing, and five percent of all the Muslims surveyed said that they had a favorable view of Al-Qaeda. Given the Pew Center’s estimate of 2.35 million Muslims in America, and the total of thirteen percent that avowed a belief that suicide bombings could ever be justified, that’s over 300,000 supporters of suicide attacks. And 117,500 supporters of Al-Qaeda.

With such a high percentage who believe in in the justification of suicide bombings and who support AL-Qaeda, then perhaps CAIR is a worthy representative of Muslims in America…


CAIR’s Ibrahim Hooper
(Photo from: Dhimmi Watch)

Chaim

Crossposted at Freedom's Cost

Labels: , , , , ,

Socialize this! Personalize this! Radicalize this!

Monday, March 12, 2007

Reap what you Sow

Supposedly, Israelis are having less of a problem with the killing of Arabs. Israelis are more inclined to want the Arab-Israelis given the boot compared to previous generations. If this is true, then I would have to ask what created this shift in opinion? If you listen to the Arab-Islamic world and the United Nations you would think that Israel created this all on it's own. Reality points to a different cause. The Arab/Islamists themselves.

For years Israel's neighbors of agitated and spurred terror organizations and "Palestinians" to incite chaos on and in Israel. They have killed Israelis by the droves while Israel did it's best to be a good nation. How many of the terrorists who have achieved or attempted to kill Israelis were given excellent medical care by the very people they were trying to kill? While Israel was trying to fightback using the failed limited warfare policy, it's enemies were intentionally attacking civilians. While Israel tried it's best to limit it's lethality to terrorists, the terrorists were bombing discoteques and restaurants.

When Israel withdrew from Gaza it had spent millions trying to maintain the economic infrastructure so the "Palestinians" would have the assets needed to feed themselves as well as setup trade in order to provide fro themselves. The "Palestinians" decided that they should destroy it all and then go back to attacking Israel. After 60 years of continuous attacks, it was only a matter of time before Israeli's tired of not only the Arabs around them but the Arabs within their borders. Allowing the Arab-Israelis to take part in the Knessett is not reciprocated in other nations. Jews are, at best, second class citizens in "Arab" nations.

The terrorists created this situation and are going to sit back and watch Israel do what is natural. Israel must defend itself and must use all means necessary to do so. The actions necessary will lead to it's labelling of racist. This is all part of the Arab/Islamic conspiracy and subterfuge. It appears the Islamists have learned more about the west than the west has of it.
The frontline against Islamic terrorism is Israel. Iraq and Afghanistan are extensions of the same battle. The Islamists have exactly what they wanted. They have sewn terror and will now become victim of that same terror. Unfortunately we are allowing them to take all of us.
I have moved from Biga's Rants to Gentile Warrior.

Labels: , , ,

Socialize this! Personalize this! Radicalize this!

Wednesday, February 28, 2007

Israeli soldiers kill 3 Islamic Jihad militants

CNN reports:

JERUSALEM (CNN) -- Israeli forces killed three members of the Palestinian militant group Islamic Jihad during a raid in the West Bank town of Jenin Wednesday morning, Israeli and Palestinian sources said.


According to an Israeli military spokeswoman, Israeli soldiers entered Jenin and tried to arrest Ashraf Saadi, a senior member of Islamic Jihad, as he was walking with two other members of the group. The spokeswoman said Saadi saw the soldiers and fired on them.


In returning fire, the soldiers killed Saadi and the other two militants, the spokeswoman said. An Israeli soldier was lightly wounded in the exchange.


Israeli security sources said the militants were involved in terror activities.


Palestinian security sources' accounts said Israeli undercover soldiers in a car, and backed by jeeps, opened fire on the militants as they were walking along a street, killing them.


What IS Palestinian security, anyway? Either way...there are three more Islamic militants with Mohammed now. Hope they don't mind a little heat. ;)

Good riddance.

Labels: , ,

Socialize this! Personalize this! Radicalize this!

Monday, January 29, 2007

PDP sending signals to terrorists to join electoral battle

Terrorists and politics:

Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) in Jammu and Kashmir is sending strong signals to terrorists to join politics and has supplemented this offer with a firm indication that the party would concede political space to them in the electoral battles.


The party leadership has made it clear that it wanted to change the discourse of Kashmir politics for terrorists by offering a stake to them in the politics of ballots, and declared that the infamous 1987 elections would not be repeated.

If you think about it terrorists have been in volved in politics for a while now. Look at how they influenced November's election. Why not give them a stake. Maybe they will blow less things up.

Labels: ,

Socialize this! Personalize this! Radicalize this!

Wednesday, January 10, 2007

MS-13 in Tennessee

La Mara Salvatrucha, or MS-13 is referred to as a dangerous gang, but they are more than a gang. They are murderers, rapists, thieves, and terrorists. They are a violent international criminal organization composed primarily of immigrants (many illegal aliens) or descendants of immigrants from El Salvador.

Now they are in Tennessee. The Department of Justice announced the indictment of 13 members of MS-13 today which alleges that gang members killed three people and attempted to kill at least seven others. The indictment further alleges that MS-13 was organized in "cliques," including the Thompson Place Locos Salvatruchos clique (TPLS), which operated in Nashville.

Marasalvatruchamember (MS-13 member with common tattoos) The MS-13 gang has cliques, or factions, located throughout the United States and is unique in that it retains its ties to its Salvadoran counterparts. In 2005, the FBI declared Mara Salvatrucha to be the most dangerous gang not only in the United States, but the entire globe.

Membership is believed to total over 50,000 in the United States alone. MS-13 criminal activities include drug smuggling and sales, black market gun sales, human trafficking, assassinations for hire, theft, and assaults on law enforcement officials. (Wikipedia)

According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the 13 have been 'indicted by a federal grand jury in the Middle District of Tennessee on charges that they conspired to participate in a violent RICO enterprise responsible for killings and other violent crimes.

The one-count racketeering indictment names the following 13 individuals, all of whom are currently in federal or state custody:

* Oscar Serrano, a/k/a "Diablin"

* Escolastico Serrano, a/k/a "Chito"

* Omar Hirbin Gomez, a/k/a "Lil Homie"

* David Alexander Gonzalez, a/k/a "Psycho"

* Ernesto Isai Mendez-Tovar, a/k/a "Joker," a/k/a "Choey"

* Francisco Dago Mendez, a/k/a "Silent"

* Walter Hernandez, a/k/a "Spanky"

* Henry Garballo-Vasquez, a/k/a "Cuervo"

* Eliseo Iglesias, a/k/a "Smokey"

* Ronald Fuentes, a/k/a "Spia"

* Ericka Cortez, a/k/a "Shorty"

* Geovanni Pena, a/k/a "Rata," and

* Jose Alfaro, a/k/a "Liche." (source)

Assistant Attorney General Fisher said, "We will utilize the same tools we used to put Mafia leaders behind prison bars to confront the threat posed by violent criminal enterprises like the MS-13." Tennessee has a problem with illegal aliens, and some MS-13 members fall into that category. They 'originated in Los Angeles and quickly spread across the country, including to Middle Tennessee, and currently include approximately 10,000 members in at least 10 states, Mexico, Honduras and El Salvador, making it one of the largest street gangs in the United States.'

"MS 13 makes up one percent of one percent of the Latino community in Nashville," said Jim Cavanaugh with the ATF (Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms). [snip]

If convicted, the defendants face life in prison. (source)

More on illegals in Tennessee from stickNstein, An Illegal Immigration Magnet…….Tennessee Lawmakers talk Tough…… :

An article at The Tennessean.com says folks are getting mad and the new crop of politicians coming back to the Capitol for this years’ session are feeling it.
“This is my country. I fought for this country. I hold this country deeply in my heart,” said Brown, 40, of Hermitage. “I am not going to let illegal immigrants come in and intimidate us.”

His sentiments are held by many in Middle Tennessee — part of a broader national chorus calling out for something to be done about illegal immigration. The National Conference of State Legislatures last week forecast that illegal immigration would be the hottest issue for legislators across the country this year.


KEEPING UP THE HEAT……..Politicians in Washington as well as State Legislatures think the half hearted, un-funded, and un-enforced excuses for legislation passed to get themselves re-elected
last year have lulled Americans to sleep about illegal immigration. [snip]

But a Tennessee lawmaker STATED:

“We need to demagnetize the state. We need to stop Tennessee from being a magnet for illegal immigrants,”said Rep. Glen Casada, R-Franklin.

Maybe Tennessee is finally waking up to the big problem we have here. Getting rid of MS-13 members is a good first step.

**This was a production of The Coalition Against Illegal Immigration (CAII). If you would like to participate, please go to the above link to learn more. Afterwards, email the coalition and let Brian know at what level you would like to participate.**

Originally Posted at Right Truth

Labels: , ,

Socialize this! Personalize this! Radicalize this!

Saturday, December 30, 2006

The State of Denial!


For me it is simply amazing the state of denial that people are in about Islamic terrorism.

Many of us must have forgot about what happened on 9/11 not to mention all the previous attacks. People seem to be so focused on telling themselves "All Muslims are peaceful" instead of facing the fact that at least 10 to 15 percent of them want to kill you. Thats not even including those that have a hate for America and Western Culture. That percentage is much higher. Not to mention that the percent of Muslims that want to see Islamic Law to rule the world is even higher than that.

It seems the White House is blind as to what Islam really means to Muslims. They have not a clue about the deep Islamic teachings. Not to mention the incoming house intelligence chairman didn't know if al Qaeda was Shi'ite or Sunni. He also seemed to be unaware of who Hizbollah even is. If a 23 year old College kid like me knows these things and understands why they are important don't you think the government officials should? How can we fight someone if we don't even know who the enemy is? Of course with all this ignorance of Islam and saying "Islam is a religion of peace" the government decides that the FBI and Military needs Islamic sensitivity courses. You also have the TSA inviting CAIR to teach what is billed as "cultural sensitivity training".

How ridiculous is this? Most of the terrorist attacks on this country and around the world are done by Radical Muslims. That being said why would you not profile Muslims? Why is it hard for Muslims to see why people are skeptical of them? If it had been A Christian or a Jew that was quoting from their sacred texts to justify terror then I would say we should profile them. And I believe that the Christians and Jews should understand why they are being profiled. But that is not the case. This is not about hating someone because they are Muslim. Its about facing the hard truth that we don't like to admit.

Until we face up to this and stop with all this political correct nonsense we will never win. We must understand why questions must be ask of Muslims of how they feel about Womens rights? and if they would like to see Islamic Law replace the Constitution one day. Nothing is harsh in those questions they are honest questions that we justifiably as Americans are concerned about. Until these things are done and we begin to start fighting a war like Patton spoke of we will never truly defeat the Islamic fascist. Its time to wake up America.

Labels: , , ,

Socialize this! Personalize this! Radicalize this!

Monday, December 18, 2006

Norwegians trained by Al-Qaida

Sven and Ola
From the Norway Post:

Two Norwegians have undergone training by Al-Qaida in Pakistan to become terrorist contacts in Norway, according to Newsweek, quoting a Taliban source.

Together with an Australian and nine from Great Britain, the two Norwegians with Muslim background have reportedly been trained at a camp on the border between Pakistan and Afghanistan.


Newsweek's source says he met the 12 recruits in the town of Mir Ali in the region of Northern Waziristan in November 2005.


- Their task is to function as organizers for Al-Qaida in their homeland, the former Taliban intelligence chief says to Newsweek.


Oh Dat's a gude one, ey! I never imagined Norwegian Terrorists. No, wait...they wouldn't just be Norwegian terrorists, they would be Norwegian MUSLIM terrorists. That puts it in better perspective.

Norway is a country of 46,161 Muslims. That is about 1% of its population. With the USA's 9,732,061 Muslims, the odds are that the Newsweek reporter would have encountered 6 or more Americans training in Afghanistan. I have seen NO exclusive interviews with the new Adam Gadahn.

Al-Qaida in Norway. It simply shows that these people want nothing less than the world in their pocket. Uffdah!

Labels: , , , , , ,

Socialize this! Personalize this! Radicalize this!

Monday, December 11, 2006

America's Imamania


America's Muslim holy men beyond reproach?

From Miss Kelly:

More from an Indian newspaper on the connection between the two arrested Boston imams and the founder of a notorious Pakistani terrorist group, reported by Amir Mir:


"The Pakistani authorities have confirmed the American findings that the imams of three mosques arrested on November 15 in Boston happen to be the close relatives of the founder of the deadly Lashkar-e-Toiba, Hafiz Mohammad Saeed, who now heads the Jamaatul Daawa. Pakistani interior ministry sources said ....they have informed the American authorities that while Hafiz Muhammad Masood and Hafiz Hamid happen to be the real brother of Saeed, Hafiz Muhammad Hannan is his brother-in-law.


"The sources say although the three imams have been released on bail, they are still facing legal proceedings and there are chances of their being deported to Pakistan especially after their family relations with Hafiz Saeed have been confirmed. Both Lashkar-e-Toiba and Jamaatul Daawa are generally considered to be pro-Osama and an anti-US groups which have been banned by the US State Department in 2002 and 2006 respectively."


Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT) is "one of the largest and most active Islamic terrorist outfits in South Asia." LeT is responsible for:


the Suicide bombing of the Indian Parliament in 2001 (12 dead, 22 injured),
the 2005 Delhi bombings in a crowded market (62 dead, 210 wounded),
the Mumbai train bombing in July 2006 (163 dead, 460 wounded), and plenty more.


LeT's explicitly stated goals are to destroy the Indian republic, to annihilate Hinduism and Judaism, and to restore Islamic rule over all parts of South Asia, Russia and even China. Hafiz Saeed himself has called for the assassination of Pope Benedict. Jamaat ud Dawa is a "humanitarian organization" set up as a front by LeT.


From Wiki: "The declaration of LeT (and Jamaat ud Dawa) as a terrorist organization by the United States Secretary of State in 2003 preserves the U.S. Government’s ability to take action against them in accordance with the provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act, making it illegal for persons in the United States or subject to U.S. jurisdiction to provide material support to this terrorist groups. It requires U.S. financial institutions to block assets held by them; and it enables them to deny visas to representatives of this group."
Question: Have any of the mosques of Imams Masood (ICNE Sharon), Hannan (ISGL) and Hamid (ISGW) raised money for Jamaat ud Dawa?


More IMAM-a-Jammin' from Minneaoplis, MN:

Suspicion about the Flying Imams grows as terror links pile up...


The grounded imams incident at the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport has been a public relations coup for the imams, their supporters and their claims that the group's only suspicious activity was saying evening prayers.


US Airways continues to defend its crew's decision to pull the imams off a plane last month, saying they took the seating configuration used by 9/11 hijackers, requested seat-belt extensions that could be used as weapons and otherwise raised concerns.


Who are the parties involved here, who seem so interested in linking airport security with racial bigotry?


The Council on American-Islamic Relations, the imams' legal representative, is an organization that "we know has ties to terrorism," Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., said in 2003. And the Muslim American Society, which is also supporting the imams? It's the American arm of the Muslim Brotherhood, according to the Chicago Tribune, which called it "the world's most influential Islamic fundamentalist group."


How about Omar Shahin, the imams' spokesman and also president of the North American Imams Federation? He is a native of Jordan, who says he became a U.S. citizen in 2003. From 2000 to 2003, Shahin served as president of Islamic Center of Tucson (ICT), that city's largest mosque.


The ICT is well known. The mosque has "an extensive history of terror links," according to terrorism expert Steven Emerson, who testified about terrorist financing before the Senate Banking Committee in July 2005.


The Washington Post described these links in a 2002 article. "Tucson was one of the first points of contact in the United States for the jihadist group that evolved into al Qaeda," the Post reported. And the ICT? It held "basically the first cell of al Qaeda in the United States; that is where it all started," said Rita Katz, a terrorism expert quoted by the Post.


ICT members have included high-profile terrorists. Wael Hamza Jelaidan, the mosque's leader in the mid-1980s, was identified by the U.S. government as a " 'co-founder' of al Qaeda and its logistics chief," the Post reported.


Another former member, Wadi Hage, served as Osama bin Laden's personal secretary after leaving Arizona, the Post said, attributing it to government sources. Hage established a bin Laden support network in Arizona and "this network is still in place," Emerson wrote in his book "Jihad Incorporated: A Guide to Militant Islam in the U.S.," citing a 2002 Senate Intelligence Committee Report. In 2001, Hage was convicted of plotting the 1998 bombings of the U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania.


The best-known terrorist with apparent (according to the Post and Emerson) connections to the ICT is Hani Hanjour, who piloted the plane that flew into the Pentagon on 9/11. Hanjour took aviation lessons in Tucson in the late 1990s.

Shahin has downplayed the ICT's connections to terrorism. The mosque should not be held accountable for former members who may have engaged in terrorism after they left Arizona, he told the Post in 2002. Al-Qaida nests in America? "All of these, they make it up," he told the Arizona Republic shortly after 9/11.





Shining examples of men of prayer...

Labels: , , ,

Socialize this! Personalize this! Radicalize this!

Friday, December 01, 2006

A Terror Of A Film

Deaf, Dumb, and Stupid.

Just for kicks and wheelchairs-- a "fake" trailer made for the 50 Horrible Movie Pitches contest winners at the Phat Phree:

Click for Video.

It is the story of three handicapped men who discover that there are terrorists living in their assisted living group home. Our heroes do what any red-blooded patriot would: They set off on a cross-country trip in a stolen handicapped van to warn the President.

Starring two "hilarious" comic actors and one "fantastic" leading man.

Free-for-alled at:
Stop the ACLU
Blue Star Chronicles
Woman Honor Thyself
Dumb Ox News

Labels: , ,

Socialize this! Personalize this! Radicalize this!

Monday, November 13, 2006

Hearing Muslim Voices

Seyyed Hossein NasrFrom Speaking of Faith:

September 7, 2006

» Download (mp3, 53:10)
» Listen Now (RealAudio, 53:00)
» Podcast


Dramatic headlines convey a predominantly violent picture of global Islam. But, during the past five years, Muslim guests on SOF have conveyed a thoughtful, questing, diverse, and compelling faith. Step back with us and hear these voices from the traditional and evolving center of Islam. And, Krista speaks with Seyyed Hossein Nasr, an esteemed Muslim scholar who brings a broad religious and historical perspective to hard questions about Islam and the West that have lingered uncomfortably in American life since 9/11.

Although I do not agree with some of the guest's comments regarding America's complicity in Islamic Hate, I found this to be quite informative...after all I will take any Muslim moderate voice (?) I can. Well worth a listen.

Labels: , , ,

Socialize this! Personalize this! Radicalize this!

Thursday, November 09, 2006

'We saw legs, heads and hands scattered' - America Threatened



'We saw legs, heads and hands scattered'

Nice Al-Reuters headline and nice how they fail to state that the attack was in response to rockets being fired into Israel from that location. Of course the question remains: did the Israeli rockets malfunction? Remember it is always Israel's fault...that is if it isn't America's fault FIRST.

Beit Hanun, Gaza: Israeli artillery shells killed at least 18 Palestinian civilians in northern Gaza on Wednesday, local officials and witnesses said, prompting swift vows of retaliation from Hamas and Islamic Jihad.


It was the deadliest single Israeli attack on Palestinians in four years.


"We saw legs, we saw heads, we saw hands scattered in the street," said Attaf Hamad, 22, in Beit Hanun, a town in the northern Gaza Strip.


The strike was condemned across Europe and the Middle East. But an initial response by the United States stopped short of reprimanding Israel.


Israeli Defence Minister Amir Peretz ordered an inquiry, and a halt to shelling in Gaza until the investigation was complete. Some of the dead were killed in bed as shells struck seven houses, and others rushed outside but found no safety.


Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas spoke of a "horrible and ugly massacre".


Khalid Mesha'al, leader of the governing Hamas, urged retaliation.


"All Palestinian groups are urged to activate resistance despite the difficult situation on the ground. Our confidence in our military wing to respond is great," said Mesha'al, who is based in Damascus.


The Islamic Jihad group, which never accepted the ceasefire brokered by Abbas and Egypt, vowed to carry out suicide bombings in response to the Beit Hanun strike.


Hamas's armed wing, decrying Washington's "political and financial support" for Israel, appeared to call on Muslims to attack US targets, urging them "to teach the American enemy harsh lessons".


In a rare show of unity, Abbas and Prime Minister Esmail Haniya of Hamas donated blood together and visited a hospital in northern Gaza treating some of Beit Hanun's 54 wounded.

Isn't that touching. Here's an idea...how about stopping attacking Israel and blaming America? I'm sure blood donations would go WAY DOWN if you did.

Labels: , , , ,

Socialize this! Personalize this! Radicalize this!

Friday, November 03, 2006

Jihadists Hope Democrats Gain Power

Senior Jihadist leaders say they hope the democratic party is voted into power next week in America. They say the stated policy of the democrats for withdrawal from Iraq ensures a worldwide victory for islamic terrorists.

Many in America don't seem to be listening, but the jihadists keep telling us what their plans for us are. They plan to destroy us. Regardless of whether or not we see the Battle of Iraq as a front on the Global War on Terror, the terrorists see it that way.

WorldNetDaily interviewed senior jihad leaders who said a withdrawal from Iraq would be viewed as a victory for terrorism and would embolden terrorists to continue the fight until America and Israel are destroyed.

Here's what they said:

Jihad JaaraJihad Jaara whose claim to fame is that he is a senior member of Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades. This jihad group is known for the seige of the Bethlehem's Church of the Nativity in 2002. This group has also taken responsibility for every suicide bombing in Israel over the last two years.

Of course Americans should vote Democrat. This is why American Muslims will support the Democrats, because there is an atmosphere in America that encourages those who want to withdraw from Iraq. It is time that the American people support those who want to take them out of this Iraqi mud.

He also said a withdrawal from Iraq would "mark the beginning of the collapse of this tyrant empire (America)."

Muhammad Saadi
is a senior leader of Islamic Jihad. He says the democrats talking about withdrawal from Iraq makes him proud.

As Arabs and Muslims we feel proud of this talk. Very proud from the great successes of the Iraqi resistance. This success that brought the big superpower of the world to discuss a possible withdrawal.

In response to Nancy Polosi's assertion that the jihadists are only in Iraq because our Troops are in Iraq, Saadi laughed. He said that would be a victory of the jihadists and prove that their methods of jihad work.

The victory of the Iraqi revolution will mark an important step in the history of the region and in the attitude regarding the United States.

Notice he said, 'will', 'will mark'. He says this as though it is a done deal and he's licking his chops over it.


Abu AbdullahAbu Abdullah is a leader of Hamas in Palestine. He says the democrats are proving they are winning.

We warned the Americans that this will be their end in Iraq. They did not succeed in stealing Iraq's oil, at least not at a level that covers their huge expenses. They did not bring stability. Their agents in the [Iraqi] regime seem to have no chance to survive if the Americans withdraw.


He also said it would give encouragement to the Palestinians in their war against Israel.

The victory of the resistance in Iraq would prove once more that when the will and the faith are applied victory is not only a slogan. We saw that in Lebanon (during Israel's confrontation against Hezbollah there in July and August); we saw it in Gaza (after Israel withdrew from the territory last summer) and we will see it everywhere there is occupation.

See, when Israel chose to cease fighting in Lebanon without destroying hesbollah, that was considered a victory. Hesbollah has declared victory over Israel. Stopping without defeating is not winning a war and only gives the enemy a chance to regroup and declare victory.


Abu AymanAbu Ayman, another Islamic Jihad leader.

[The mujahedeen fighters] brought the Americans to speak for the first time seriously and sincerely that Iraq is becoming a new Vietnam and that they should fix a schedule for their withdrawal from Iraq.

Interesting he would make a Vietnam comparison. That was a war the very same people helped us lose. It was also the beginning of the demise of the world's respect for America.

All these jihadists don't seem to think the democrats really will withdraw the troops. They say it's just campaign slogans and that both the dems and the republicans are 'agents of Zionists'

Besides they all say that withdrawing from Iraq isn't enough. Americans should withdraw from every muslim and arab land.

I am afraid that even after the American people will elect those who promise to leave Iraq, the U.S. will not do so. I tell the American people vote for withdrawal. Abandon Israel if you want to save America. Now will this Happen? I do not believe it.


crossposted at Blue Star Chronicles

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Socialize this! Personalize this! Radicalize this!

Monday, October 30, 2006

Pakistan Destroys al-Qaida Site


Pakistan Army takes out an al-Qaida training center:

KHAR, Pakistan - Pakistani troops backed by missile-firing helicopters destroyed a purported al-Qaida-linked training facility in a northwestern tribal area near the Afghan border Monday, officials said. At least 20 people were killed.


The pre-dawn attack targeted a religious school, or madrassa, holding 70-80 militants in Chingai village near Khar, the main town in the Bajur tribal district, said army spokesman Maj. Gen. Shaukat Sultan.


The bodies of 20 tribesmen killed in the attack were lined in a field near the madrassa before an impromptu burial attended by thousands of locals, according to an Associated Press reporter at the scene.


Sultan said the attack targeted terrorists training at the al-Qaida-linked facility, but local leaders said those killed in the raid were innocent civilians.


Among the dead was Liaquat Hussain, a local Islamic cleric who ran the madrassa and is believed to have been sheltering al-Qaida militants, locals said. Several of his aides also died, they said.


The attack came two days after 5,000 pro-Taliban tribesmen held an anti-American rally in the Bajur area near Damadola, a village close to the site of an alleged U.S. missile attack that killed several al-Qaida members and civilians in January.


"We received confirmed intelligence reports that 70-80 militants were hiding in a madrassa used as a terrorist-training facility, which was destroyed by an army strike, led by helicopters," Sultan said.


Soldiers on the ground were counting the dead, Sultan said. He was unable to provide a preliminary estimate of the casualty count, but said that "many" militants had been killed.


Pakistan shows they are on the right side. However with all the tribal ties and the usual "religious sensitivities" I'm surprised this mission even went off. As for the "civilians' involved. Do the math! 20 dead, 20 tribesmen in a terrorist training facility. What we know is these people have no problem hiding among women and children. The probablility is that the 20 were tribesmen by day...terrorists by night.

**UPDATE**-HotAir.com is reporting that Al-Qaida top bananastan, Zawahiri was the target. Faqir Mohammed, an al-Zawahiri deputy was on the scene before or during the raid. I wonder if he was trying to pass as an innocent tribesman too.

Labels: , , , ,

Socialize this! Personalize this! Radicalize this!

Friday, October 20, 2006

US Border: Less Than A Line In The Sand


You'll find Hugo Chavez towards the end of the newly released Congressional Report on border (in)security. Click here for "A Line In The Sand," PDF warning..

Oliver North writes
:
"...the bombshell -- as reported by Lajeunesse and confirmed in the congressional report -- is the role being played by Venezuelan strongman Hugo Chavez. It's well known that the oil-rich Marxist in Caracas has been busy spreading his anti-American "Bolivarian Revolution" throughout our southern hemisphere. But this investigation now concludes that Chavez's nefarious deeds go well beyond a weapons-buying spree and efforts to manipulate elections in Bolivia, Ecuador and Nicaragua.

According to the congressional report, "Venezuela is providing support --including identity documents -- that could prove useful to radical Islamic groups The Venezuelan government has issued thousands of cedulas, the equivalent of Social Security cards, to people from places such as Cuba, Colombia and Middle Eastern nations that host foreign terrorist organizations." These documents can be used to obtain Venezuelan passports and American visas, which in turn allow the holder to elude immigration checks and enter the United States ..."
Indeed.

Gustav Colonel of Venezuela Today
wrote about Hezbollah training camps, and subsequent forced conversion of the native population to Islam, back on Sept. 2nd. As a matter of fact, here's a link to the internet website set up by Hezbollah in Venezuela.

Here are some not very comforting numbers: According to the Border Patrol cited in the new congressional report, OTM's (other than Mexican) illegal immigrants crossing the border since 2001 has increased from 30,147 in 2001 to 108, 025 in 2006. These are not all humble, honest illegal immigrants who are dying to mow your lawn for cheap. DHS has reported a 41% increase in "Special Interest Aliens" along the southern Texas border alone.

Nor are those numbers just a cheap workforce -- it's an army, or at least it could be.

Add these facts to the puzzle: 1) Some OTM's come via Venezuela, or are at least facilitated by Chavez. 2) Chavez has been spending his oil money to acquire weapons, and has recently made a deal with Putin to set up an AK-47 factory in Venezuela (although that is probably of more concern to his neighbors, and those inside his country that disagree with him politically). 3) Chavez' new best bud, Ahmadinejad is developing nuclear technology, and since the Iranians already run a couple of refineries for Chavez, it's not out of the question that there will be a deal to share nuclear technology.

Meanwhile, the circus continues at the UN. John Bolton, and Mexico, have called upon Chavez to withdraw. I doubt that he will until after the Venezuelan elections are over in December.

Finally, check out this article from the Persian Journal. It's a little loopy, but I can't help but agree with Scott Sullivan's conclusion that the US state department is working against US foreign policy interests.

Folks working against US domestic security interests include US politicians of all stripes, who continue to tap-dance around the border issue, in hopes of capturing the holy grail full of Hispanic votes.

Adapted from RedHotCuppaPolitics

Labels: ,

Socialize this! Personalize this! Radicalize this!

Thursday, October 19, 2006

(T/F) This Is Security ...


Just for fun, let's try to guess which of the statements is true and which is false. (Hint - Elimination by logic will be neither accepted nor necessary):

1) Al Quada has threatened to set off dirty bombs in seven American stadiums this weekend.
2) The ACLU has just succeeded in making contraband searches illegal at NFL stadiums.
3) College football stadiums have excellent security.
4) High school football stadiums are most secure in Texas because high school marching band moms tend to be better armed there.

Answer: The first two are true. I don't know about number three, and can't comment on #4.

For extra points, write in your own words why the threats aren't credible. "Because I said so" doesn't count, but extrapolation is okay. Use all the theoretical models you can think of.

For more extra points: Pretend like something actually did happen this weekend. Estimate how much taxpayer money will be spent in Congressional investigations aimed at proving it was Bush's fault all along. (Hint - you may count as high as you know how to, then round up to the nearest hundred million.)

StetsonTip JawaReport.

From RedHotCuppaPolitics.

(graphic is a book cover, but I think you get the general idea)

Labels: ,

Socialize this! Personalize this! Radicalize this!

Tuesday, October 17, 2006

Feeling Sorry for The Traitor Lynne Stewart

Judge Koeltl said the reason he gave such a light sentence to The Traitor Lynne Stewart was because he felt sorry for her.

This is how the main stream media presented The Traitor Lynne Stewart before her sentencing:

Poor Lynne Stewart


A broken, pathethic grandmother who had just survived breast cancer (coincidentially during breast cancer awareness month). She had just used poor judgement and had a 'soft heart' and all she did was try to help a fellow 'human being'.

This is The Traitor Lynne Stewart after her sentencing:

Defiant Lynne Stewart


Defiant, anti-American, radical left socialist who says she doesn't really think what she did was wrong, it's just unfortunate 9/11 happened after she helped the terrorists, otherwise, people wouldn't have been that upset with her.

The people I feel sorry for are the victims of her crimes against our country. Do we remember them?


It's time to QUIT feeling SORRY for people who are enemies of the United States of America and start pulling together for the survival of our country.

I agree with Linda who had a much better suggestion about proper sentencing for a traitor.

noose


Too bad we don't hang traitors anymore.


previous:

crossposted at Blue Star Chronicles

Labels: , ,

Socialize this! Personalize this! Radicalize this!

Monday, October 16, 2006

Christian Pastor Executed in Indonesia

Sulawesi ProvinceRev. Irianto Kongkoli was shot twice in the back of the head while he was shopping in Palu, the capital of Central Sulawesi province of Indonesia.
A Christian priest has been shot dead on Indonesia's Sulawesi island, where religious tensions are high after the execution of three Catholic militants.


The Rev Irianto Kongkoli was shot in the head while shopping in Palu, the capital of Central Sulawesi province.


It was part of a wave of religious violence between 1999 and 2001 that left more than 1,000 people dead.

The Rev Kongkoli was buying construction materials at a shop when he was targeted, a spokesman for the provincial government's information bureau said.

"He had finished bargaining for some tiles when someone called him back into the store. When he entered, two shots were fired at the back of his head," Jethan Towakit told Reuters news agency.
PoliceRev. Kongkoli had been outspoken against the executions of three Christians last September. Indonesia is home of the largest number of muslims. There has been violence between Christians and Muslims there since 1998.

The reports of the violence in Indonesia refer to 'religious violence' and to fighting being Christian and muslim mobs or gangs. But with a couple of exceptions, the horrors that are reported are muslim against Christian. The incidents in which the violence was initiated by Christian groups, it was in retaliation for horrors like the beheading of young Christian girls walking to school.

Remember, about 19 million muslims in Indonesia support violent jihad against the West and Western interests.

Odd, the United States isn't in Indonesia but they are still having violent acts perpetrated by muslims. Since 1998. I don't think this is the fault of the United States.

This is more evidence that the jihad against the West is not just about us finding bin Laden. Doing away with bin Laden won't take care of this problem. This is why we are in Iraq, it is why it's a much bigger problem than one person or one terrorist cell.

This is why it's called the Global War on Terror.

Rusty Shackleford has a plan of action.

More: Michelle Malkin, Gateway Pundit

crossposted at Blue Star Chronicles

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Socialize this! Personalize this! Radicalize this!

Contributors

Jihadi Du Jour is actively looking for contributors who are concerned about America's future and are willing to research and post about the fight against Islamic Jihad. If you are interested email us at jihadidujour@yahoo.com

RASTAMAN
MEDIAN SIB
CAREN E
OBADIAH
U. INFIDEL
LAYLA
TODD
BERNIE
DEBBIE

HEIDI

JAY
JAMES
KATHY
JOHN
JOE S.

BETH
ROBERT

DARRELL
CHAIM

Guests: Stan Smith | Leonard Magruder | Random Thoughts @ TROP | Brigitte Gabriel | Annaqed The Critic | Miss Kelly | CENTCOM

Courtesy of Gabrielle--download and use freely

Blogroll Buzz! | Sponsored Buzz!

Featured video


And Blip.TV

Most wanted





Member:
NowPublic